全球智库信息集成服务系统(G2TT): The Economics of Regulatory Repeal and Six Case Studies

G2TT

来源类型	Report
规范类型	报告
	The Economics of Regulatory Repeal and Six Case Studies
	Alan J. Krupnick; Arthur G. Fraas; Justine Huetteman; Isabel Echarte
发表日期	2018-11-06
出版年	2018
页码	29 pp.
语种	英语
概述	Should regulations stay or should they go? RFF researchers conducted cost-benefit analyses of six regulations generating industry complaints.
结论	For five out of the six rules analyzed, the benefits forgone outweigh the cost savings under a reasonable set of assumptions. Prioritizing repeal using the preferred net benefits criterion yields very different rankings than prioritizing according to cost savings alone. Better accounting for sunk cost and benefits as well as the degree of compliance is needed to improve repeal analyses. Uncertainties in the benefits analyses need to be handled better and with an eye to making a future repeal analysis more meaningful. Regulatory impact analyses should be seen as informative, not as a definitive decisionmaking tool.
子主题	Benefit-Cost Analysis ; Policy Instruments and Evaluation
URL	http://www.rff.org/research/publications/economics-regulatory-repeal-and-six-case-studies
来源智库	Resources for the Future (United States)
资源类型	智库出版物
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/39516
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Alan J. Krupnick,Arthur G. Fraas,Justine Huetteman,et al. The Economics of Regulatory Repeal and Six Case Studies. 2018.