Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 论文 |
Was the NOAA Panel Correct About Contingent Valuation? | |
Richard T. Carson; W. Michael Hanemann; Raymond J. Kopp; Jon A. Krosnick; Robert C. Mitchell; Stanley Presser; Paul A. Ruud; V. Kerry Smith; Michael Conaway; Kerry Martin | |
发表日期 | 1996-06-01 |
出版年 | 1996 |
页码 | DP 96-20 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | The past few years have seen a highly charged debate about whether contingent valuation (CV) surveys can provide valid economic measures of people's values for environmental resources. In an effort to appraise the validity of CV measures of economic value, a distinguished panel of social scientists, chaired by two Nobel laureates, was established by NOAA, to critically evaluate the validity of CV measures of nonuse value. The Panel provided an extensive set of guidelines for CV survey construction, administration, and analysis, and distinguished a subset of items from their guidelines for special emphasis and described them as burden of proof requirements. Of particular interest was the Panel's requirement that CV surveys demonstrate "responsiveness to the scope of the environmental insult." That demonstration has come to be called a scope test. The paper reports the findings from the first CV study that adheres to the NOAA Panel's guidelines and includes a formal scope test. |
主题 | Environmental Economics Topics |
URL | http://www.rff.org/research/publications/was-noaa-panel-correct-about-contingent-valuation |
来源智库 | Resources for the Future (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/40437 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Richard T. Carson,W. Michael Hanemann,Raymond J. Kopp,et al. Was the NOAA Panel Correct About Contingent Valuation?. 1996. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。