Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 论文 |
An Experimental Study of Auctions versus Grandfathering to Assign Pollution Permits | |
Jacob Goeree; Charles Holt; Karen L. Palmer; William Shobe; Dallas Burtraw | |
发表日期 | 2009-09-28 |
出版年 | 2009 |
页码 | DP 09-39 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | We experimentally study auctions versus grandfathering in the initial assignment of pollution permits that can be traded in a secondary spot market. Low and high emitters compete for permits in the auction, while permits are assigned for free under grandfathering. In theory, trading in the spot market should erase inefficiencies due to initial mis-allocations. In the experiment, high emitters exercise market power in the spot market and permit holdings under grandfathering remain skewed towards high emitters. Furthermore, the opportunity costs of “free” permits are fully “passed through.” In the auction, the majority of permits are won by low emitters, reducing the need for spot-market trading. Auctions generate higher consumer surplus and slightly lower product prices in the laboratory markets. Moreover, auctions eliminate the large “windfall profits” that are observed in the treatment with free, grandfathered permit allocations. |
主题 | Environmental Economics Topics ; Energy and Electricity ; Air Quality |
子主题 | Cap and Trade ; Electricity Markets and Regulation |
URL | http://www.rff.org/research/publications/experimental-study-auctions-versus-grandfathering-assign-pollution-permits |
来源智库 | Resources for the Future (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/41021 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Jacob Goeree,Charles Holt,Karen L. Palmer,et al. An Experimental Study of Auctions versus Grandfathering to Assign Pollution Permits. 2009. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。