Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 论文 |
What Do Respondents Bring to Contingent Valuation? A Comparison of Monetary and Labor Payment Vehicles | |
Godwin K. Vondolia; Håkan Eggert; Stale Nåvrud; Jesper Stage | |
发表日期 | 2011-12-22 |
出版年 | 2011 |
页码 | EfD DP 11-13 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | With contingent valuation, both the goods being valued and the payment vehicles used to value them are mostly hypothetical. However, although numerous studies have examined the impact ofexperience with the good on willingness to pay, less attention has been given to experience with payment vehicles. This paper examines how this influences responses to a contingent valuation scenarioof maintenance for irrigation canals. Specifically, the paper uses a split-sample survey to investigate the effects of experience with monetary and labor payment vehicles on the acceptance of a contingentvaluation scenario and protest bids. Using convergent validity tests, we found that experience acquired from using both monetary and labor payment vehicles reduces the asymmetries in acceptance rates. These findings suggest that experience with payment vehicles reduces time/money response asymmetries in the contingent valuation method. |
主题 | Development and Environment ; International ; Environmental Economics Topics |
子主题 | Africa ; Valuation |
URL | http://www.rff.org/research/publications/what-do-respondents-bring-contingent-valuation-comparison-monetary-and-labor |
来源智库 | Resources for the Future (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/41163 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Godwin K. Vondolia,Håkan Eggert,Stale Nåvrud,et al. What Do Respondents Bring to Contingent Valuation? A Comparison of Monetary and Labor Payment Vehicles. 2011. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。