Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
Trend-Setting Factors in the Field of Central vs. Decentral Orientations of the Energy Transition and Starting-Points for Resilience as a Lead-Concept | |
Wachsmuth, Jakob; Petschow, Ulrich; Brand, Ute; Fettke, Ulrike; Pissarskoi, Eugen; Fuchs, Gerhard; Dickel, Sascha; Kljajic, Mariane | |
发表日期 | 2015 |
出版年 | 2015 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | The extent of the recent uncertainty about the future changes of the energy system is unique in a historic sense. This is particularly the case because the current energy system is destabilised. It can be foreseen that there has to be substantially more control systems at the level of the distribution network. The outcomes of the report showed that there is no consensual or unique approach to the future of the energy system and is still open to interpretation. There are two opposite concepts which were developed during the project: the Masterplan and Short-dated Management. Between those two, the general orientation of subsidiarity could work as a compromise between central and decentral orientation. |
主题 | Innovation and Technology ; Climate and Energy ; Environmental Policy and Governance ; Digital Transformation |
URL | https://www.ioew.de/en/publication-single/trend_setting_factors_in_the_field_of_central_vs_decentral_orientations_of_the_energy_transition_an |
来源智库 | Institute for Ecological Economy Research (Germany) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/412336 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Wachsmuth, Jakob,Petschow, Ulrich,Brand, Ute,et al. Trend-Setting Factors in the Field of Central vs. Decentral Orientations of the Energy Transition and Starting-Points for Resilience as a Lead-Concept. 2015. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
resys.jpg(32KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | ![]() 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。