G2TT
来源类型Working Paper
规范类型论文
Difference in Preferences or in Preference Orderings? Comparing Choices of Environmental Bureaucrats, Recreational Anglers, and the Public
Håkan Eggert; Mitesh Kataria; Elina Lampi
发表日期2016-08-27
出版年2016
页码28 pp.
语种英语
摘要

Do Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) bureaucrats represent the general public or are they more in line with an interest group? We study preferences for environmental policy using a choice experiment (CE) on three populations; the general public, Swedish EPA bureaucrats, and recreational anglers. We also test for existence of multiple preference orderings, i.e., whether responses differ depending on the decision role assigned. Half of the respondents were asked to choose the alternatives that best corresponded with their opinion, and the other half was asked to take the role of a policymaker and make recommendations for environmental policy. The SEPA bureaucrats have the highest marginal willingness to pay (MWTP) to improve environmental quality. These differences are robust and not due to differences in socioeconomic characteristics across the populations. We found little evidence of multiple preference orderings, but in one case the difference in MWTP between the two roles was substantial.

主题Development and Environment
URLhttp://www.rff.org/research/publications/difference-preferences-or-preference-orderings-comparing-choices-environmental
来源智库Resources for the Future (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/41462
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Håkan Eggert,Mitesh Kataria,Elina Lampi. Difference in Preferences or in Preference Orderings? Comparing Choices of Environmental Bureaucrats, Recreational Anglers, and the Public. 2016.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Håkan Eggert]的文章
[Mitesh Kataria]的文章
[Elina Lampi]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Håkan Eggert]的文章
[Mitesh Kataria]的文章
[Elina Lampi]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Håkan Eggert]的文章
[Mitesh Kataria]的文章
[Elina Lampi]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。