全球智库信息集成服务系统

This has led to a tenuous compromise between those in China advocating for the use of coal as a matter of economic necessity and social stability (security of supply, reliable and cheap electricity, and indigenous energy technologies) and those who strive for more environmentally sustainable growth (and thus emphasize “clean” coal). The convergence of these two concepts has spurred a major shift towards newer, more efficient, though still highly polluting technologies - notably larger scale, hotter burning supercritical and ultra-supercritical coal-fired plants. But it has also spawned a number of demonstration-scale projects in various cutting-edge technologies to include coal gasification and carbon capture and storage (CCS), which promise vast improvements in CO2 and other, toxic emissions if widely adopted. Indeed, mitigating climate change while continuing to rely heavily on coal will only be possible if carbon can successfully be captured and stored on a broad scale.

The push to develop new coal technologies opens doors for both foreign and Chinese businesses to work together, potentially creating new market opportunities at home and abroad. Chinese companies can receive much-needed capital and expertise, while foreign companies and researchers are given the chance to test and develop technologies at a level of speed and scale that is not possible on their own domestic markets. This cooperation has also had clear benefits on a political level, particularly between China and the United States. Indeed, it has proven a useful diplomatic tool and a meaningful cushion in an otherwise rocky bilateral relationship. But if and when the time comes to access third markets, the culture of cooperation around advanced coal may quickly turn into a cutthroat race for market access.

But before this stage can be reached, a number of very high hurdles remain. Implementing and maintaining these technologies is expensive and requires vast amounts of additional energy in order to make them truly cleaner in respect to emissions. Responding to the price challenge is particularly tricky. It means successfully reducing the cost of advanced technology and reforming China’s power pricing structure to internalize the real cost of coal on society. This must somehow happen without tipping the balance of affordable energy needed to power the country’s economic development. Moreover, in regards to CCS in particular, progress must also be made in reducing the energy demand. Current technologies require an input of 20-30% more energy to capture and store carbon. In China, this could translate into an untenable increase in coal demand, likely pushing an already overburdened industry well beyond the breaking point. And yet another formidable hurdle risks negating any progress made in developing cleaner coal technologies: water scarcity. The coal industry is China’s largest industrial water user - demanding 34 billion m3 in current times - and is also concentrated in the nation’s driest regions. But a lack of adequate consideration of the relationship between coal and water in policy planning holds grave risks for the future.

Ultimately, while coal will continue to play an important role in China’s economy, the challenges to making it truly cleaner are formidable. A certain reality must be granted to the need for cleaner coal in China today, but substantial pressure should be put on a phasing down, if not a phasing out of coal in China’s future energy mix.