G2TT
来源类型Publications - Reports - Focus Stratégique
规范类型报告
DOI978-2-36567-509-3
Forces terrestres et réassurance : Quelles options pour l'Alliance ? Focus stratégique, No. 65, January 2016
Guillaume LASCONJARIAS
发表日期2016-01-29
出版年2016
概述Born into the Cold War, the very notion of ‘reassurance’ was revived in the wake of the 2014 Ukraine crisis as NATO had to label the measures destined to reassert the lasting relevance of collective defense towards its member states. 
摘要 Forces terrestres et réassurance : Quelles options pour l'Alliance ? Focus stratégique, No. 65, January 2016

Born into the Cold War, the very notion of ‘reassurance’ was revived in the wake of the 2014 Ukraine crisis as NATO had to label the measures destined to reassert the lasting relevance of collective defense towards its member states. 

lasconjarias_couv.jpg

This has led to an increased role for land forces, despite the serious political, economic and operational difficulties involved. NATO has striven to revitalize its concept of rapid response by means of the VJTF, however, some issues remain unsolved regarding the range of actions to be undertaken in order to uphold reassurance as a lasting principle. The main problem is related to the delicate balance to be maintained between a posture of firmness – based on rapid reaction capacities – and a risk of escalation associated with potential worsening of tensions. For land forces, this translates into a return towards the know-how and practice that two decades of expeditionary warfare have kept out of the picture.

This content is available in French : Forces terrestres et réassurance: Quelles options pour l'Alliance?

关键词Nato Réassurance Great Britain Poland France Germany Russia Ukraine United States
URLhttps://www.ifri.org/en/publications/enotes/focus-strategique/forces-terrestres-reassurance-options-lalliance
来源智库French Institute of International Relations (France)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/416112
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Guillaume LASCONJARIAS. Forces terrestres et réassurance : Quelles options pour l'Alliance ? Focus stratégique, No. 65, January 2016. 2016.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
lasconjarias_couv.jp(30KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
fs65lasconjarias.pdf(472KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
Focus+stratégique,+No.+65,+January+2016" target="_blank">谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Guillaume LASCONJARIAS]的文章
百度学术
Focus+stratégique,+No.+65,+January+2016" target="_blank">百度学术中相似的文章
[Guillaume LASCONJARIAS]的文章
必应学术
Focus+stratégique,+No.+65,+January+2016" target="_blank">必应学术中相似的文章
[Guillaume LASCONJARIAS]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: lasconjarias_couv.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: fs65lasconjarias.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。