全球智库信息集成服务系统

In this wider context, 2014 is a watershed year – with a double meaning. Conclusions drawn from Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea in March that year led to a change of paradigm in German approaches vis-à-vis Moscow. Even earlier that year, high-ranking officials laid out what was sometimes labelled the ‘Munich consensus’ on security policy at the Munich Security Conference: Germany would assume greater responsibility for international security and stability. Since then, there have been considerable evolutions in German discourses and policies: the new approach needed to be translated into actual engagement on the international scene. This was (and continues to be) accompanied by measures at domestic level. Germany decided to increase the country’s defence budget. Moreover, a new ‘White Paper on Security and Defence and the Future of the Bundeswehr’ replaced its decade-old and outdated predecessor in July 2016.

 

Against this background, Germany’s engagement in the BSR may be a test case for the general evolution of German security policy. This chapter will consequently analyse how Berlin’s action there fits into the overall context of the current German security and defence policy. What are the likely decisive factors in Germany’s engagement in the region; is Berlin intending to play the role of a ‘Baltic power’, and how is its approach linked to the wider context of German foreign and security policy?

 

The book project ‘Perceptions of Germany in the Security on the Baltic Sea Region’ assembles the contributions from Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark, Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, and Germany. It assesses the perceptions of Germany’s contribution to hard, soft and regional security of the Baltic Sea region. The publication also engages in a mapping exercise, pinning down the most important perception drivers – various stake-holders from public and private sector and most important security narratives – and offers recommendations.