Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Op-Ed |
规范类型 | 评论 |
Ukraine’s Effect on a Deal for Syria: Iran Could Become More of a Player | |
Martha Brill Olcott | |
发表日期 | 2014-03-18 |
出处 | New York Times |
出版年 | 2014 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Putin’s annexation of Crimea may be a victory at home, but it will harm Russia’s interests in the Middle East. If Iran could get sanctions removed, it might benefit from selling gas and oil to Europe. |
正文 | Vladimir Putin’s rhetorically rich invocation of faith, language and history may endear him to the vast majority of his countrymen, but it won’t buy him the international support he needs to defend Russia’s broader interests, including those in the Middle East. Putin has had limited international support for his policy in Ukraine. China abstained in the United Nations Security council, where 13 countries voted to endorse the territorial integrity of Ukraine, among them Jordan. Jordan’s own domestic stability has been put at risk by the presence of some half million refugees from Syria, where Assad’s continued survival must be counted as another of Putin’s policy triumphs. Not surprisingly, Assad has been the most vocal supporter of Russia’s policies in Ukraine. The Syrian president's political survival is critical if Putin wishes to retain any foothold in the Middle East, a region where Moscow’s influence -- so critical during the “hot years” of the Arab-Israeli conflict in the 1960s and 1970s -- was diminished by the Middle East peace process. Russia’s future influence in Syria, may depend on Iran, Assad’s other major ally. Lakdar Brahimi, the United Nations special envoy on Syria, visited Tehran to discuss the crisis on March 17. The meeting came just a day after Mohammad Javad Zarif, Iran's foreign minister, together with Vladimir Makei, Belarus's foreign minister, called for dialogue and international law to prevail in Ukraine. Iran could benefit from a boycott against Russia; it has the gas and oil to meet the energy needs of Moscow’s current customers, if only they could get the international sanctions against them removed. It remains to be seen if Tehran’s new rulers are pragmatic enough to figure out how to use the situation in Syria to help them do this, and if the U.S. will allow them this role. This article was originally published in the New York Times. |
主题 | Middle East ; Iran ; Syria ; Russia ; Eastern Europe ; Ukraine ; Defense and Security ; Foreign Policy ; Political Reform |
URL | https://carnegieendowment.org/2014/03/18/ukraine-s-effect-on-deal-for-syria-iran-could-become-more-of-player-pub-55026 |
来源智库 | Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/422326 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Martha Brill Olcott. Ukraine’s Effect on a Deal for Syria: Iran Could Become More of a Player. 2014. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Martha Brill Olcott]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Martha Brill Olcott]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Martha Brill Olcott]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。