Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Op-Ed |
规范类型 | 评论 |
A No-Deal Brexit Would Be a Geopolitical Crisis | |
Erik Brattberg | |
发表日期 | 2019-01-11 |
出处 | Axios |
出版年 | 2019 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | A no-deal Brexit would consume all political and strategic energy in London at a time when Europe is facing rising geopolitical threats from Russia and China. |
正文 | The House of Commons will vote on Jan. 15 on Prime Minister Theresa May’s Brexit withdrawal agreement with the EU. If the agreement fails to gain support — a likely outcome — the specter of a no-deal Brexit will loom as the March 29 deadline approaches. Why it matters: The prospect of a no-deal Brexit is alarming for both economic and geopolitical reasons. It would propel the U.K. out of the EU’s single market, roiling the U.K.’s economy and causing trade chaos with the EU. The Bank of England predicts an immediate 8% drop in British GDP under this scenario. Moreover, Britain would be in complete political turmoil and its international standing would take a heavy toll. A no-deal Brexit would suck up all political and strategic energy and attention in London at a time when Europe is facing rising geopolitical threats from Russia and China. Unfortunately for May, Washington is no help here. President Trump has taken the pro-Brexiteers’ side. He believes that a hard Brexit, or even a no-deal Brexit, would be beneficial for U.S. trade with Britain. Trump has on several occasions also undermined May’s efforts.
Yes, but: There might still be some wiggle room for last minute deal-making, though the margin for error is small. The U.K. could, for instance, try to secure an extension of the negotiations from the EU, but this would require unanimity from the 27 EU members. Other possible options include a new last-minute vote in Parliament, new elections or even a second Brexit referendum. The bottom line: With so much at stake, the U.K. might decide to pull the plug on the entire Brexit enterprise to avoid the costs of exiting the EU. Barring such an outcome, British politicians could at least pursue the deal that May has reached, since it would limit the damage done by ensuring an orderly Brexit and paving the way for the next phase of discussing the future U.K.–EU relationship. |
主题 | Americas ; United States ; Western Europe ; United Kingdom ; Democracy and Governance ; Foreign Policy ; Political Reform ; Global Governance ; Rule of Law |
URL | https://carnegieendowment.org/2019/01/11/no-deal-brexit-would-be-geopolitical-crisis-pub-78110 |
来源智库 | Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/423770 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Erik Brattberg. A No-Deal Brexit Would Be a Geopolitical Crisis. 2019. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Erik Brattberg]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Erik Brattberg]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Erik Brattberg]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。