G2TT
来源类型Policy Contribution
规范类型简报
Who decides? Resolving failed banks in a European framework
Christopher Gandrud; Mark Hallerberg
发表日期2013-11-29
出版年2013
语种英语
概述When public support is provided to failed institutions it should come from a bankfunded resolution fund. This would reduce taxpayers’ direct costs, and would make banks less likely to take risks and advocate for bailouts
摘要

As the basis for a European regime for resolving failing and failed banks, the European Commission has proposed the Bank Resolution and Recovery Directive (BRRD) and a regulation establishing a European Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) and a Single Bank Resolution Fund (SBRF). There is a debate about which parts of the proposed SRM-SBRF to add to the BRRD. The BRRD sets out a resolution toolkit that can be used by national resolution authorities. The SRM would involve European institutions more at the expense of national resolution authorities. This change could affect resolution outcomes.

Domestic resolution authorities might be more generous than supranational authorities in providing assistance to banks. A supranational approach might be more effective in minimising costs for taxpayers. But regardless of the final design, more attention is needed to ensure that resolution authorities are politically independent from governments.

When public support is provided to failed institutions it should come from a bankfunded resolution fund. This would reduce taxpayers’ direct costs, and would make banks less likely to take risks and advocate for bailouts

主题European Macroeconomics & Governance
URLhttps://bruegel.org/2013/11/who-decides-resolving-failed-banks-in-a-european-framework/
来源智库Bruegel (Belgium)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/429433
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Christopher Gandrud,Mark Hallerberg. Who decides? Resolving failed banks in a European framework. 2013.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
pc_2013_16_.pdf.jpg(90KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
pc_2013_16_.pdf(139KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Christopher Gandrud]的文章
[Mark Hallerberg]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Christopher Gandrud]的文章
[Mark Hallerberg]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Christopher Gandrud]的文章
[Mark Hallerberg]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: pc_2013_16_.pdf.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: pc_2013_16_.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。