G2TT
来源类型REPORT
规范类型报告
The Other College
Molly F. McIntosh; Cecilia Elena Rouse
发表日期2009-02-10
出版年2009
语种英语
概述Report from Molly F. McIntosh and Cecilia Rouse examines retention and completion rates in two-year colleges.
摘要

    Read the full report (pdf)

    Download the executive summary (pdf)

    Read more about higher education from CAP: College-Ready Students, Student-Ready Colleges

    Two-year colleges have long been the stepchildren of the higher education family of institutions, the so-called “other college,” despite the fact that they are the main contact with higher education for a large proportion of young people. In 2005, two-year college enrollment was almost 40 percent of total college enrollment.  

    These 6.5 million students fare far worse than their four-year peers in persisting through postsecondary education until receiving a credential. Among first-time students who start at a four-year college, approximately three-quarters persist to the second year, compared to roughly half of first-time students who start at a two-year college. Moreover, within six years, students who begin at a four-year college are twice as likely as those who begin at a two-year college to earn a degree. And those students who have not yet completed a degree are much more likely to still be enrolled in college if they started at a four-year college than if they started at a two-year college.

    This lack of persistence and degree completion presents a compelling challenge for education and economic policymakers since postsecondary education is key for both individual success and economic competitiveness in the global, knowledge-driven economy. However, encouraging degree completion among two-year college students is a complex issue due in large part to the dissimilarities between two- and four-year college students. Two-year college students are more than twice as likely to be enrolled part-time, and more than half of two-year college students are employed, compared to only 38 percent of four-year college students. Two-year college students are far less likely to be of traditional college-going age (18 to 24) than four-year college students, and they are also more likely to be of minority descent and from families of lower socioeconomic status. Finally, students who first attend two-year colleges are less academically prepared than students who first attend four-year colleges, whether this is measured by standardized test score, highest math course taken in high school, or participation in remedial education.

    This paper shines much needed light on the complexity of contemporary college going and the potential causes of the gap in persistence and degree completion. Using a human capital framework, we review literature regarding policy solutions designed to address this complexity in two broad areas. The first is the availability of financial aid to two-year college students, which may take the form of grants or loans. The second is the two-year college institutional environment, which includes remedial education, student support services, learning communities, and transfer agreements.

    Our human capital investment perspective underscores two key areas for policy consideration. First, the idea of students making “investment” decisions when choosing whether or not to enroll or persist in college brings a customer orientation to the issue. The human capital framework highlights how the needs of two-year students differ from those of their four-year peers, indicating that students at the two types of postsecondary institutions will not benefit from the same strategies regarding curriculum, teaching and learning, and student support services. Second, while there is arguably a need for increased funding for financial aid and institutional environment interventions, there is a lack of evidence of their effectiveness. A publicly funded, aggressive research agenda for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions specifically targeted at two-year colleges and their students is therefore a must.

    Given their popularity among today’s college students, America’s future economic success may well depend on how we invest in two-year institutions. National leaders would be wise to move the “other college” to the forefront of the postsecondary policymaking arena.

    Read the full report (pdf)

    Download the executive summary (pdf)

    Read more about higher education from CAP: College-Ready Students, Student-Ready Colleges

    主题Education, Postsecondary
    URLhttps://www.americanprogress.org/issues/education-postsecondary/reports/2009/02/10/5617/the-other-college/
    来源智库Center for American Progress (United States)
    资源类型智库出版物
    条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/434555
    推荐引用方式
    GB/T 7714
    Molly F. McIntosh,Cecilia Elena Rouse. The Other College. 2009.
    条目包含的文件
    条目无相关文件。
    个性服务
    推荐该条目
    保存到收藏夹
    导出为Endnote文件
    谷歌学术
    谷歌学术中相似的文章
    [Molly F. McIntosh]的文章
    [Cecilia Elena Rouse]的文章
    百度学术
    百度学术中相似的文章
    [Molly F. McIntosh]的文章
    [Cecilia Elena Rouse]的文章
    必应学术
    必应学术中相似的文章
    [Molly F. McIntosh]的文章
    [Cecilia Elena Rouse]的文章
    相关权益政策
    暂无数据
    收藏/分享

    除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。