G2TT
来源类型ISSUE BRIEF
规范类型简报
Federal Judicial Emergencies
Andrew Blotky; Sandhya Bathija
发表日期2012-11-08
出版年2012
语种英语
概述Andrew Blotky and Sandhya Bathija on the state of judicial emergencies in the nation.
摘要

Endnotes and citations are available in the PDF and Scribd versions.

Nearly two-thirds of the nation’s population—170 million Americans—today are living in a jurisdiction that has been declared a judicial emergency* meaning that in courtrooms across the country there aren’t enough judges to hear the cases that are piling up. The map below depicts the areas of the country where there are federal district courts and circuit courts of appeal with judicial emergencies. In practical terms, it shows where judges are overworked and where justice is being significantly delayed for the American public. The nation’s federal courts—where Social Security appeals are heard, employment cases decided, immigration issues settled, and where Americans vindicate their constitutional rights—are in a crisis because there simply aren’t enough judges on the bench.

Seven judicial emergencies at the federal circuit court level:

As of May 9, 2013, there are seven judicial emergencies in the following circuit courts:

  • (2) Fifth Circuit—Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi
  • (1) Seventh Circuit—Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin
  • (2) Ninth Circuit—Alaska, Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, California, Nevada, Arizona, Hawaii
  • (2) Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals—Alabama, Georgia, Florida

Twenty-nine judicial emergencies at the district court level:

As of May 9, 2013, there are 29 judicial emergencies in the following district courts:

  • (1) District of Puerto Rico
  • (1) Southern District of New York
  • (1) Western District of New York
  • (1) Eastern District of North Carolina
  • (2) Eastern District of Texas
  • (1) Southern District of Texas
  • (1) Western District of Texas
  • (1) Western District of Wisconsin
  • (5) District of Arizona
  • (1) Eastern District of California
  • (3) Northern District of California
  • (2) District of Montana
  • (1) District of Oregon
  • (1) District of Kansas
  • (1) Northern District of Alabama
  • (2) Middle District of Florida
  • (2) Southern District of Florida
  • (2) Northern District of Georgia

Federal judicial emergencies

* The nonpartisan Administrative Office of the United States Courts defines a judicial emergency as: a circuit court vacancy and adjusted case filings greater than 700, or an 18-month vacancy and filings between 500 and 700; or a district court vacancy with filings greater than 600, an 18-month vacancy where weighted filings are between 430 and 600, or any court with more than one judgeship and only one active judge.

Andrew Blotky is the Director of Legal Progress at the Center for American Progress. Sandhya Bathija is a Campaign Manager with Legal Progress at the Center.

主题Courts
URLhttps://www.americanprogress.org/issues/courts/reports/2012/11/08/11914/federal-judicial-emergencies/
来源智库Center for American Progress (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/435362
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Andrew Blotky,Sandhya Bathija. Federal Judicial Emergencies. 2012.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
050913_judicial_emer(417KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Andrew Blotky]的文章
[Sandhya Bathija]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Andrew Blotky]的文章
[Sandhya Bathija]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Andrew Blotky]的文章
[Sandhya Bathija]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: 050913_judicial_emergencies.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。