Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | REPORT |
规范类型 | 报告 |
Concrete Steps to Address the Crisis in Ukraine | |
Ken Sofer | |
发表日期 | 2014-03-12 |
出版年 | 2014 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | The United States possesses key economic and diplomatic tools to support international law and impose a cost on Russia for its invasion of Ukraine. |
摘要 | U.S., European, and Russian leaders have watched the political crisis in Ukraine with great concern since last fall when hundreds of thousands of protestors rallied in Kiev’s Independence Square. The demonstrations were against then Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych’s decision to reject closer economic ties with the European Union. But what started as a domestic political crisis over the direction of Ukraine’s economy has now escalated into an international military crisis with Russia’s subsequent blatant violation of Ukraine’s territorial integrity. Following the initial protests in November, an escalating spiral of violence between Ukrainian security services and the protestors eventually drove Russian-leaning President Yanukovych from power in February to be replaced by government officials who favor a stronger relationship with the European Union. Less than 10 days after Yanukovych’s ouster, the Russian government deployed several thousand troops into the Ukrainian region of Crimea—a strategically important peninsula on the Black Sea with a majority ethnic Russian population and a Russian naval base in the port city of Sevastopol. Russian President Vladimir Putin has defended the military incursion into Ukrainian territory under the pretense of protecting Crimea’s large Russian-speaking population from Ukrainian authorities and right-wing Ukrainian nationalists. The Russian government now appears to be preparing to annex Crimea and incorporate it into the Russian Federation, which would be a further escalation of the conflict and another significant violation of international law. The Ukrainian political crisis and Russia’s apparent willingness to annex Crimea has raised several important strategic questions for U.S. policymakers as they coordinate a response with allies in the European Union and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or NATO. When determining the most effective course of action, policymakers should assess ways to support various U.S. priorities in the crisis, including, but not limited to:
Ken Sofer is a Policy Analyst with the National Security and International Policy team at the Center for American Progress. |
主题 | Foreign Policy and Security |
URL | https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/security/reports/2014/03/12/85775/concrete-steps-to-address-the-crisis-in-ukraine/ |
来源智库 | Center for American Progress (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/435706 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Ken Sofer. Concrete Steps to Address the Crisis in Ukraine. 2014. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
Ukraine-report.pdf(294KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Ken Sofer]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Ken Sofer]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Ken Sofer]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。