Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | REPORT |
规范类型 | 报告 |
Framework for Action | |
Chelsea Parsons; Arkadi Gerney; Tim Daly | |
发表日期 | 2015-12-15 |
出版年 | 2015 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | State executives have many options for adopting policies and programs to address gun violence in their state that do not require legislative action. |
摘要 | It has been three years since one of the nation’s most horrific mass shootings: the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School. The movement to enact stronger gun laws since that tragedy has been characterized by two seemingly conflicting trends. In communities across the country, the groundswell of activism and engagement has been unprecedented. The public is demanding action by local, state, and national leaders to address the epidemic of gun violence in this country—not only regarding the mass shootings that garner the bulk of media attention, but also for the thousands of shooting deaths that too often go unnoticed. Millions of Americans have signed petitions and pledges; called their elected representatives; and organized and attended rallies and vigils pleading for change. At the same time, the inertia in Congress has been inexorable, as our elected representatives have largely failed to heed these calls for action to enact the common sense legislation that is supported by a vast majority of Americans and would undoubtedly save lives. Yet, in the face of these conflicting dynamics, there has been substantial leadership at the state level to take on the gun lobby and enact stronger gun laws. Since 2013, a number of states—including Colorado, Connecticut, Washington state, and Oregon—have enacted new laws to require background checks for all gun sales, closing the biggest loophole in the states’ gun laws and bringing the total number of states that have implemented this law to 18. In addition, 18 states have strengthened their laws to prevent domestic abusers from having easy access to guns. There has also been substantial innovation by many state legislatures to enact new approaches to gun violence: For example, in 2014, California enacted a law to provide a flexible remedy for family members to temporarily disarm an individual who is experiencing a mental health or other personal crisis that increased their risk of committing an act of gun violence. While action in Congress remains challenging, state leaders can continue to innovate and even go further to proactively address gun violence in this country. One opportunity that has been underutilized in many states is the option of nonlegislative action to address gun violence. State executives—including governors, attorneys general, public health officials, and heads of state police—have substantial authority to implement new regulations, policies, and protocols in order to address many different aspects of gun violence that affect local communities. Actively exercising this authority will have a real effect on both reducing gun violence and saving lives. At the same time, this type of executive action is crucial to help bolster and support the legislative efforts that are underway in many states to strengthen gun laws in the face of the gun lobby’s extreme pressure and opposition. Use of executive authority will also help spur and drive new legislative efforts in states that have not yet been successful in this area. In this report, the Center for American Progress offers 28 recommendations across six categories for how state executives can take nonlegislative action to address various aspects of gun violence in their communities: Strengthening background checks
Enhanced enforcement of current laws
Improved data collection and analysis
Enhanced community engagement
Enhanced oversight of gun carrying
Enhanced regulation of the gun industry
To be sure, not every recommendation is appropriate or feasible in every state. State laws vary widely, and states often face varying challenges when it comes to gun violence. But the list of ideas offered in this report is intended to present wide-ranging options for state executives who are committed to taking real action to address gun violence in their communities. Chelsea Parsons is Vice President of Guns and Crime Policy at the Center for American Progress. Arkadi Gerney is a Senior Fellow at the Center. Tim Daly is the Director for Campaigns, Guns and Crime at the Center. |
主题 | Gun Violence Prevention |
URL | https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/guns-crime/reports/2015/12/15/127399/framework-for-action/ |
来源智库 | Center for American Progress (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/436177 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Chelsea Parsons,Arkadi Gerney,Tim Daly. Framework for Action. 2015. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
ExecActionStates-rep(1372KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。