Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | FACT SHEET |
规范类型 | 其他 |
Home Visiting 101 | |
Leila Schochet; Rachel Herzfeldt-Kamprath | |
发表日期 | 2016-09-16 |
出版年 | 2016 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | This fact sheet explains how evidence-based home visiting programs improve outcomes for at-risk children and families from the start. |
摘要 | What is home visiting?When new parents bring their baby home from the hospital, they face a challenging yet exciting task. Babies do not come with instruction manuals, but home visiting programs offer the next best thing. Home visiting programs connect families that are living in poverty or facing other risk factors with nurses, social workers, and other trained professionals who can equip them with the necessary knowledge and resources to create a healthy home environment. These voluntary, evidence-based programs improve outcomes for children and families by providing coaching and support to parents throughout pregnancy and a child’s early years of life. Home visiting services are tailored to meet the specific needs of families and communities. Services can vary by state or community but typically include:
How does the federal government support home visiting?The Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting, or MIECHV, program is a federal grant program designed to expand evidence-based home visiting services across the country. Through MIECHV, states, territories, and tribal communities are implementing 17 evidence-based home visiting models in targeted high-risk communities. MIECHV has funded over 2.3 million home visits in the past four years, and in 2015, more than 145,000 children and parents were served by MIECHV grantees. Benefits and outcomes of home visitingHome visiting programs are a means of leveling the playing field for children, aiming to give every child an equitable start. By taking a preventative approach, programs are able to reach children before they fall behind in their development and school readiness. Home visiting programs have been rigorously evaluated and consistently demonstrated to be one of the most effective social programs ever studied. These programs contribute to positive outcomes for children and families and significant cost savings for taxpayers. Improved child health, school readiness, and achievementChildren whose parents participated in home visiting programs are born with fewer instances of low birthweight, are more likely to be breastfed by their mothers, and experience fewer cases of child injuries, child abuse, neglect, and maltreatment. Research also shows significant gains in school readiness and achievement: Parents in home visiting programs are more likely to read aloud to their children at home and children served by these programs achieve higher math and reading scores, as well as better grades in elementary school. Improved maternal health and family economic self sufficiencyStudies show that birth parents enrolled in home visiting programs have improved prenatal health and reduced rates of maternal depression. Home visiting participation is also linked to higher rates of employment, greater participation in education and job trainings, higher monthly incomes, and reductions in the use of welfare and cash assistance programs. Strong families, strong economyHome visiting programs help empower and strengthen families, which in turn strengthens the economy. Preventative health care and improved child and family health outcomes contribute to significant economic savings due in part to fewer hospital visits and lower participation rates in medical assistance programs. Improved child well-being and family self-sufficiency are also associated with savings due to reduced participation in public assistance programs, fewer children in the juvenile justice system, and fewer children in child protective services. If all eligible children and families were enrolled in these evidence-based programs, it is estimated that states could save up to $2.4 billion and the federal government could save up to $813 million over 10 years. Next stepsWhile research has consistently demonstrated that home visiting works, funding is insufficient to enroll all vulnerable families in home visiting programs. Since the initial authorization of MIECHV, funding has only been extended in two-year increments as opposed to longer-term investments. Program operation is made more difficult by these short-term funding extensions, as programs cannot expand their services without more consistent and reliable funding. Policymakers should:
Leila Schochet is the Research Assistant for the Early Childhood Policy team at the Center for American Progress. Rachel Herzfeldt-Kamprath is a Policy Analyst for the Early Childhood Policy team at the Center. |
主题 | Early Childhood |
URL | https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/early-childhood/reports/2016/09/16/144349/home-visiting-101/ |
来源智库 | Center for American Progress (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/436381 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Leila Schochet,Rachel Herzfeldt-Kamprath. Home Visiting 101. 2016. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
HomeVisiting101-fact(61KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。