Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | FACT SHEET |
规范类型 | 其他 |
The Women’s Leadership Gap | |
Judith Warner; Danielle Corley | |
发表日期 | 2017-05-21 |
出版年 | 2017 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | Using new data, this fact sheet update shows that women make up a majority of the U.S. population, but they lag substantially behind men when it comes to their representation in leadership positions. |
摘要 | For a more recent version of this information, see “The Women’s Leadership Gap” by Judith Warner, Nora Ellmann, and Diana Boesch. This fact sheet is an updated version of “The Women’s Leadership Gap,” published on August 4, 2015. See also: “Opening the Gates” by Judith Warner Women make up a majority of the U.S. populationWomen are 50.8 percent of the U.S. population.1
And yet …Although they hold almost 52 percent of all professional-level jobs,7 American women lag substantially behind men when it comes to their representation in leadership positions:
Furthermore …Women’s on-screen image is still created, overwhelmingly, by men:
A stalled revolutionThe last decades of the 20th century brought considerable progress in women’s professional advancement in the United States. The gender wage gap narrowed, sex segregation in most professions greatly declined, and the percentage of women climbing the management ranks steadily rose. Yet, the progress has been uneven and is slowing—there are significant racial and ethnic differences in terms of women’s success in moving into the top-level jobs, and overall, women continue to fall far short of matching the success of their male counterparts in breaking into the top jobs. Although the rapid rate of change of the 1970s and 1980s began to slow in the 1990s and 2000s, as the narrowing of the gender wage gap stalled and the percentage of women in management jobs stagnated,20 a notable increase in women’s representation in very top positions did continue:
In recent years, however, the percentage of women in top management positions and on corporate boards has stalled:23
The numbers have become even more dire for women of color, with very few moving into these top-level opportunities and a number of very high-impact departures in recent years. Women of color face an even wider gapThe representation of women of color in corporate leadership roles is worse still. Women of color were 38 percent of the nation’s female population and 20 percent of the entire U.S. population in 2015.27 In 2015, they made up 35 percent of the female labor force, 16 percent of the total labor force,28 and 16.5 percent of workers in S&P 500 companies.29 And yet …
How does the United States measure up to other countries?Very unevenly. The United States ranks first in women’s educational attainment on the World Economic Forum’s 2016 Global Gender Gap Index of 144 countries. But it ranks 26th in women’s economic participation and opportunity and 73rd in women’s political empowerment.33 In fact, in the public sector—and in the percentage of female legislators in particular—the United States lags far behind many countries:
U.S. women in politics: Much promise, less changeIn the 1980s and early 1990s, the percentage of women running for office increased steadily, culminating in the so-called Year of the Woman in 1992, when the number of women in the U.S. Senate suddenly doubled—from two to four—and the number of women in Congress increased from 28 to 47.36 In more recent election cycles, however, the percentage of female candidates has essentially plateaued.37 In the decade leading up to 2012, the number of women elected to Congress remained basically flat, and the number of women in state legislatures actually decreased.38 2012 was considered a watershed election year for women in American politics. A series of historic wins put an end to all-male state legislatures;39 New Hampshire sent an all-female delegation to Congress;40 and the number of women of color in the U.S. House of Representatives hit a record high of 28.41 In the 2014 midterm elections, the number of women in Congress finally reached triple digits: 104.42 While the total number of seats women hold in the current Congress remained unchanged from 2014—women lost one seat in the House while gaining one in the Senate—2016 brought major breakthroughs for women of color: 43
In 2016, women also suffered multiple setbacks, most notably the defeat of Hillary Clinton, the first female presidential nominee from a major party. Currently:
And yet, the 2016 election cycle may have ushered in a new wave of women running for office. As of early 2017, EMILY’s List—an organization that recruits and trains pro-choice Democratic women—reported that they had heard from more than 11,000 women across all 50 states who are interested in running for office. During the 2016 cycle, this number was about 900.55 In sumWomen have outnumbered men on college campuses since 1988.56 They have earned at least one-third of law degrees since 198057 and accounted for fully one-third of medical school students by 1990.58 Yet they have not moved up to positions of prominence and power in America at anywhere near the rate that should have followed. In a broad range of fields, their presence in top leadership positions—as equity law partners, medical school deans, and corporate executive officers—remains stuck at a mere 10 percent to 20 percent. As recently as 2012, their “share of voice”—the average proportion of their representation on op-ed pages and corporate boards; as TV pundits, Wikipedia contributors, Hollywood writers, producers, and directors; and as members of Congress—was just 18 percent.59 In fact, it has been estimated that, at the current rate of change, it will take until 2085 for women to reach parity with men in key leadership roles in the United States.60 Judith Warner is a Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress. Danielle Corley is a Research Associate for Women’s Economic Policy at the Center. Endnotes
|
来源智库 | Center for American Progress (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/436571 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Judith Warner,Danielle Corley. The Women’s Leadership Gap. 2017. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
WomenLeadershipGap20(1164KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Judith Warner]的文章 |
[Danielle Corley]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Judith Warner]的文章 |
[Danielle Corley]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Judith Warner]的文章 |
[Danielle Corley]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。