Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 工作论文 |
来源ID | Working Paper07-1 |
The Trade Effects of Preferential Arrangements: New Evidence from the Australia Productivity Commission | |
Dean A. DeRosa | |
发表日期 | 2007 |
出版年 | 2007 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Do preferential trade arrangements (PTAs) create or divert trade? An Australia Productivity Commission study assesses large PTAs such as NAFTA, the European Union, Mercosur, as well as smaller PTAs such as the Andean Group using gravity models and Tobit regressions and suggests that major PTAs are trade diverting while minor PTAs are trade creating. Using an augmented Rose gravity model, the author challenges the APC's results by first measuring the 20 PTAs in the APC study and then expanding to include nearly 46 PTAs in total. While the author does not fault the APC's methodology, he concludes that most current PTAs are trade creating and that there is no uniform evidence of trade diversion. |
主题 | Free Trade Agreements ; Trade Policy |
URL | https://www.piie.com/publications/working-papers/trade-effects-preferential-arrangements-new-evidence-australia |
来源智库 | Peterson Institute for International Economics (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/453992 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Dean A. DeRosa. The Trade Effects of Preferential Arrangements: New Evidence from the Australia Productivity Commission. 2007. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
wp07-1.pdf(894KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Dean A. DeRosa]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Dean A. DeRosa]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Dean A. DeRosa]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。