Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | PIIE Briefing |
来源ID | PIIE Briefing17-2 |
A Path Forward for NAFTA | |
C. Fred Bergsten; Monica de Bolle; editors | |
发表日期 | 2017-07-17 |
出版年 | 2017 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) ranks at the top of anyone’s list of the most controversial trade deals of all time. Reviled by critics as unfair and as a job destroyer, praised by its defenders as having a documented record of success in spurring economic growth, NAFTA reduced tariff barriers to zero for the United States, Mexico, and Canada and led to a tripling of trade among these three countries over the last 23 years. The Peterson Institute for International Economics; has abundantly detailed the many gains and acknowledged costs of NAFTA in numerous publications. Now that President Donald Trump has launched a renegotiation of NAFTA—having at least for the moment abandoned his 2016 campaign pledge to cancel the pact outright—the fundamental question is: Can such a renegotiation produce a positive result? A broad range of experts who have contributed to this PIIE Briefing say “yes.” The new negotiations can succeed only if they focus on how the agreement can be updated and upgraded, however. NAFTA can be modernized only if President Trump’s zero-sum “America First” agenda is replaced by one that seeks to benefit all three countries and improve their competitiveness in an increasingly competitive global economy. Prioritizing American interests is of course essential in any US trade negotiation. But an obsessive concern about bilateral trade balances and narrow special interests in the United States, as opposed to broader national and regional interests, would not only deadlock the negotiations but also likely lead to inferior outcomes for all three countries, or even a breakdown in the talks and an abrogation of the agreement. And walking away from NAFTA altogether would be disastrous for consumers, producers, and retailers in the United States. As argued in several chapters of this Briefing, abandoning NAFTA would degrade regional competitiveness and terminate jobs across North America, undoing the integration achieved since the agreement’s inception. |
目录 |
1 Overview 2 The US Agenda: Trade Balances and the NAFTA Renegotiation 3 Toward a Positive NAFTA Renegotiation: A Mexican Perspective 4 NAFTA Modernization: A Canadian Perspective 5 NAFTA Renegotiation: US Offensive and Defensive Interests vis-à-vis Canada 6 Updating the North American Free Trade Agreement 7 NAFTA and Energy 8 Agriculture in the NAFTA Renegotiation 9 Streamlining Rules of Origin in NAFTA 10 Rethinking NAFTA: Deepening the Commitment to Sustainable Development 11 NAFTA as a National Security Priority |
主题 | United States ; Canada ; Mexico ; USMCA / NAFTA |
URL | https://www.piie.com/publications/piie-briefings/path-forward-nafta |
来源智库 | Peterson Institute for International Economics (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/454218 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | C. Fred Bergsten,Monica de Bolle,editors. A Path Forward for NAFTA. 2017. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
piieb17-2.pdf(723KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。