Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Policy Brief |
规范类型 | 简报 |
来源ID | Policy Brief17-24 |
Agriculture in the NAFTA Renegotiation | |
Cullen S. Hendrix | |
发表日期 | 2017-06-12 |
出版年 | 2017 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Despite agriculture’s modest contribution to GDP in all three partner countries, agricultural issues will be a thorny aspect of the NAFTA renegotiation—just as they are in other trade agreement negotiations. US and Canadian agricultural producers like NAFTA and will fight hard to preserve it. Aside from some wrangling over market access issues for dairy, poultry, and eggs and recent spats over Canadian soft lumber, farm organizations in both countries view NAFTA positively. Public opinion in Mexico is more ambivalent, but NAFTA has created strong export-oriented agricultural interests in the country’s north that balance more protectionist interests in the south. NAFTA has created complex cross-border agricultural supply chains that create value added for the US economy, particularly in GOP-leaning states. Disrupting NAFTA could create big problems for Trump-voting states and states with GOP and split Senate delegations, especially those that rely heavily on agricultural exports and intra-NAFTA trade. |
主题 | United States ; Canada ; Mexico ; Agriculture ; USMCA / NAFTA |
URL | https://www.piie.com/publications/policy-briefs/agriculture-nafta-renegotiation |
来源智库 | Peterson Institute for International Economics (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/454916 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Cullen S. Hendrix. Agriculture in the NAFTA Renegotiation. 2017. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
pb17-24.pdf(173KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Cullen S. Hendrix]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Cullen S. Hendrix]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Cullen S. Hendrix]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。