G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
Preventing Disaster after a Disaster - Lessons for Canada from US Experience | Fraser Institute
Neil Mohindra
发表日期2011-08-25
出版年2011
语种英语
概述There is a 30 percent chance that an earthquake strong enough to cause significant damage will strike southwestern British Columbia in the next 50 years. Policyholders may face major impediments to recovery when insurance coverage from a natural disaster is split—a harsh lesson many Americans learned in 2005, after the US Gulf Coast was struck by a series of major hurricanes.
摘要

There is a 30 percent chance that an earthquake strong enough to cause significant damage will strike southwestern British Columbia in the next 50 years, and a 5 to 15 percent chance that a major earthquake will strike southern Quebec or eastern Ontario. These quake zones encompass several population centers, including Vancouver, Victoria, Montreal, Ottawa, and Quebec City. If a major quake ever strikes one of these regions, renters, homeowners, and businesses will count on insurance to help them recover and rebuild. However, in addition to the hardships caused by property loss and injury, policyholders may face major impediments to recovery when insurance coverage from a natural disaster is split?a harsh lesson many Americans learned in 2005, after the US Gulf Coast was struck by a series of major hurricanes, including Hurricane Katrina.

The problems that occurred in the aftermath of Katrina demonstrate what can happen when distinctions are made in insurance coverage based on the cause of damage. Many of Katrina?s victims had insurance against wind damage, which was covered in standard insurance policies, but not flood damage, which was available only through a government program. The split in coverage resulted in costly payment delays and legal disputes.

Provincial legislation makes a similar distinction between damage caused by an earthquake and damage caused by subsequent quake-related fires. Fire following an earthquake is covered in standard home insurance packages, while earthquake coverage must be purchased separately. Alberta and BC have signaled their intention to maintain this distinction. The US experience shows that this approach could cause unnecessary hardships for insurers and policyholders alike.

The lesson from Hurricane Katrina is clear. Splitting natural disaster insurance coverage should be avoided wherever possible. Allowing insurers to offer comprehensive coverage against damage from a quake and any quake-related fires will prevent many of the problems policyholders faced following Katrina.

URLhttps://www.fraserinstitute.org/studies/preventing-disaster-after-a-disaster-lessons-for-canada-us-experience
来源智库Fraser Institute (Canada)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/461690
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Neil Mohindra. Preventing Disaster after a Disaster - Lessons for Canada from US Experience | Fraser Institute. 2011.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
preventing-disaster-(261KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Neil Mohindra]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Neil Mohindra]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Neil Mohindra]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: preventing-disaster-after-a-disaster.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。