Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
Economic Freedom of North America 2017 | Fraser Institute | |
其他题名 | New Hampshire leads U.S. in economic freedom three years running ; New York still the least-free state |
Dean Stansel; José Torra; Fred McMahon | |
发表日期 | 2017-12-14 |
出版年 | 2017 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | Economic Freedom of North America 2017 finds that New Hampshire—the Live Free or Die state—has the highest level of economic freedom among all U.S. states for the third year in a row, scoring 8.3 out of 10 in this year’s report, which measures government spending, taxation and labour market restrictions. Florida, Texas, South Dakota and Tennessee round out the top five freest states. For the third year in a row New York was the least-free state in the country at 50th, and California ranked 49th. |
摘要 | Economic Freedom of North America 2017 is the thirteenth edition of the Fraser Institute’s annual report. This year it measures the extent to which the policies of individual provinces and states were, in 2015, supportive of economic freedom, the ability of individuals to act in the economic sphere free of undue restrictions. There are two indices: one that examines provincial/state and municipal/local governments only and another that includes federal governments as well. The former, our subnational index, is for comparison of individual jurisdictions within the same country. The latter, our all-government index, is for comparison of jurisdictions in different countries. For the subnational index, Economic Freedom of North America employs 10 variables for the 92 provincial/state governments in Canada, the United States, and Mexico in three areas: 1. Government Spending; 2. Taxes; and 3. Labor Market Freedom. In the case of the all-government index, we incorporate three additional areas at the federal level from Economic Freedom of the World (EFW): 4. Legal Systems and Property Rights; 5. Sound Money; and 6. Freedom to Trade Internationally; and we expand Area 1 to include government enterprises and investment (variable 1C in EFW), Area 2 to include top marginal income and payroll tax rate (variable 1Dii in EFW), and Area 3 to include credit market regulation and business regulations (also at the federal level). These additions help capture restrictions on economic freedom that are difficult to measure at the provincial/state and municipal/local level. Results for Canada, the United States, and MexicoThe all-government index The highest-ranked Mexican states are Jalisco, Baja California, Mexico, and Coahuila de Zaragoza, all tied at 61st with 6.5, a full point behind those ranking lowest in Canada and the United States. The lowest-ranked state is Distrito Federal at 5.5, following Colima at 5.7, and Campeche at 5.9. The lowest-ranked Canadian provinces are New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Quebec, and Prince Edward Island at 7.5, tied for 56th with New York. The next lowest-ranked states in the United States are Delaware, Minnesota, and Rhode Island, tied with Manitoba at 7.6 in 52nd place. Historically, economic freedom has been declining in all three countries. Since 2004, the average score for Canadian provinces on the all-government index has fallen from 7.76 to 7.66; the average score for US states fell from 8.20 to 7.78; and for Mexico, from 6.67 to 6.17. However, economic freedom has increased in the United States and Mexico since 2013 and is only slightly lower in Canada. The subnational indices In the United States, the most economically free state was New Hampshire at 8.3, followed at 8.1 by Florida and Texas. South Dakota is fourth at 8.0. (Note that since the indexes were calculated separately for each country, the numeric scores on the subnational indices are not directly comparable across countries.) The least-free state was New York at 5.3, following California at 5.8. New Mexico and West Virginia were tied for 47th at 6.1. In Mexico, the most economically free state was Baja California at 8.0. Jalisco was second at 7.7, followed by Coahuila at 7.5. The least free Mexican states were Campeche and Chiapas at 4.9; slightly better were Guerrero at 5.0 and Oaxaca at 5.1. We have again produced for each province and state a one-page summary that contains all the latest scores and rankings for each of the components of the index as well as historical data on the overall and area scores. For brevity, these are not included in the report but are available at here. Economic freedom and economic well-being at the subnational level In addition, economic freedom at the subnational level has generally been found to be positively associated with a variety of measures of the per-capita size of the economy and the growth of the economy as well as various measures of entrepreneurial activity. There are now more than 230 articles by independent researchers examining subnational economic freedom using the data from Economic Freedom of North America. (Appendix C lists some of these articles that either use or cite Economic Freedom of North America.) Much of that literature discusses economic growth or entrepreneurship but the list also includes studies of a variety of topics such as income inequality, eminent domain, and labor markets. The results of these studies tend to mirror those found for these same relationships at the country level using the index published in Economic Freedom of the World. |
URL | https://www.fraserinstitute.org/studies/economic-freedom-of-north-america-2017 |
来源智库 | Fraser Institute (Canada) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/462165 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Dean Stansel,José Torra,Fred McMahon. Economic Freedom of North America 2017 | Fraser Institute. 2017. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
economic-freedom-of-(3326KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。