Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
How Canadian Health Care Differs from Other Systems | Fraser Institute | |
其他题名 | Canada’s health-care system stands in stark contrast to more successful universal systems around the world |
Nadeem Esmail; Bacchus Barua | |
发表日期 | 2018-03-20 |
出版年 | 2018 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | How Canadian Health Care Differs from Other Systems finds that Canada’s approach to health policy is much more restrictive than in other developed countries with more successful universal health-care systems, notably on the use of the private sector and patient cost-sharing. This is the first in a two-part series on the Canada Health Act. |
摘要 | Canada has one of the most expensive universal health-care systems in the developed world. However, there is an imbalance between the value Canadians receive and the relatively high amount of money they spend on their health-care system. Of particular concern is the fact that Canada has significantly fewer physicians and acute-care beds, and also ranks poorly for the availability of important medical technologies like MRIs and CT scanners. Of course, the most spectacular failure of Canada’s health-care system is manifested in the form of wait times, which have become a defining feature of the Canadian health-care experience. These failures have little to do with the notion of universal health care or spending. Not only does Canada rank among the top spenders on health care internationally, but provincial governments within the country have been increasing spending at unsustainable rates for years. There are several other countries around the world that share the goal of ensuring universal access to health care regardless of the patient’s ability to pay; and generally, with similar or lower health expenditures, they perform on par or better on most indicators of performance. A comparison of health policies that compares Canada’s with those in eight other high-income OECD countries with universal health care (Australia, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom) reveals significant differences. Canada is the only country of the nine where private financing for medically necessary services is disallowed and where the private sector is for the most part shut out of delivering medically necessary treatment. The ability of outpatient and inpatient specialist physicians to practise both in publicly funded universal settings and in private settings is also severely restricted in Canada in contrast to the other countries. Canada and the United Kingdom are the only two countries among the nine where patients are not expected to share directly in the cost of medically necessary treatment. Finally, Canada is the only country in the cohort that relies almost exclusively on prospective global budgets to fund its hospitals in contrast to other countries that are increasingly moving towards payment based on some measure of activity. Clearly, the policies that characterize Canada’s health-care system stand in stark contrast to those pursued by other—arguably more successful—universal health-care systems. These differences, coupled with evidence of how Canada’s health-care system underperforms, suggest the need for policy reform. |
URL | https://www.fraserinstitute.org/studies/how-canadian-health-care-differs-from-other-systems |
来源智库 | Fraser Institute (Canada) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/462185 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Nadeem Esmail,Bacchus Barua. How Canadian Health Care Differs from Other Systems | Fraser Institute. 2018. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
how-canadian-health-(1655KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Nadeem Esmail]的文章 |
[Bacchus Barua]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Nadeem Esmail]的文章 |
[Bacchus Barua]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Nadeem Esmail]的文章 |
[Bacchus Barua]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。