G2TT
来源类型Article
规范类型其他
DOI10.1177/030631283013001004
ISBN0306-3127
Assessing Basic Research: The Case of the Isaac Newton Telescope.
Irvine, John; Martin, Ben R
发表日期1983
出处Social Studies of Science
出版年1983
页码49-86
语种英语
摘要In a parallel paper, we have outlined a methodology for assessing the comparative scientific performance of large basic research facilities (and their associated user groups) working in the same specialty, and applied this method of `converging partial indicators' to an evaluation of the contributions to science made by a number of radio telescopes. In this paper, we employ this methodology to evaluate the scientific performance of various optical telescopes — in particular, the 2.5-metre Isaac Newton Telescope, operated as a central facility by the Royal Greenwich Observatory in South-East England. For several years, this was Britain's only major optical telescope, as well as being the largest such instrument in Europe. We compare its performance over the last decade with that of three American telescopes of similar size. This paper has three aims: first, to ascertain whether the method of converging partial indicators, originally applied to radio astronomy, provides a more general policy tool that can be extended to other specialties; second, to determine just how successful each optical telescope has been in producing new astronomical knowledge over the past decade; and, third, to discuss whether our results on the comparative scientific performance of the Isaac Newton Telescope may have any implications for British astronomy policy in general.
URLhttp://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/30430/
来源智库Science Policy Research Unit (United Kingdom)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/466217
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Irvine, John,Martin, Ben R. Assessing Basic Research: The Case of the Isaac Newton Telescope.. 1983.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Irvine, John]的文章
[Martin, Ben R]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Irvine, John]的文章
[Martin, Ben R]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Irvine, John]的文章
[Martin, Ben R]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。