Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Article |
规范类型 | 其他 |
DOI | 10.1080/09537325.2013.801950 |
ISBN | 0953-7325 |
Just how difficult can it be counting up R&D funding for emerging technologies (and is tech mining with proxy measures going to be any better?). | |
Hopkins, Michael M; Siepel, Josh | |
发表日期 | 2013 |
出处 | Technology Analysis and Strategic Management |
出版者 | Taylor & Francis |
出版年 | 2013 |
页码 | 655-685 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Decision makers considering policy or strategy related to the development of emerging technologies expect high quality data on the support for different technological options. A natural starting point would be R&D funding statistics. This paper explores the limitations of such aggregated data in relation to the substance and quantification of funding for emerging technologies. Using biotechnology as an illustrative case, we test the utility of a novel taxonomy to demonstrate the endemic weaknesses in the availability and quality of data from public and private sources. Using the same taxonomy, we consider the extent to which tech-mining presents an alternative, or potentially complementary, way to determine support for emerging technologies using proxy measures such as patents and scientific publications. |
特色分类 | H Social Sciences (General) |
关键词 | science and technology and innovation policy studies, technology and innovation studies, science and technology indicators, emerging technologies, data mining, social shaping of technology |
URL | http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/39785/ |
来源智库 | Science Policy Research Unit (United Kingdom) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/466693 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Hopkins, Michael M,Siepel, Josh. Just how difficult can it be counting up R&D funding for emerging technologies (and is tech mining with proxy measures going to be any better?).. 2013. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
HopkinsTASM.pdf(771KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。