| 来源类型 | Article |
| 规范类型 | 其他 |
| ISBN | 1357-938X |
| Inclusive deliberation and scientific expertise: precaution, diversity and transparency in the governance of risk. | |
| Stirling, Andrew | |
| 发表日期 | 2001-02-01 |
| 出处 | Participatory Learning and Action |
| 出版者 | International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) |
| 出版年 | 2001 |
| 页码 | 66-71 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | There is growing interest in many industrialised nations in more 'deliberative and inclusionary processes' (DIPs) for the governance of technological risks. This increasing interest is motivated by diminishing public confidence in traditional expert-based and quantitative approaches. The mainstream response in academic and policy circles is to explain this diminishing public confidence in social and cultural terms, rather than through examining existing limitations in expert risk science. By focusing on problems of risk governance that lie 'out there' in society, movements towards more inclusive deliberation may reduce friction with powerful institutional and disciplinary vested interests. |
| URL | http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/15838/ |
| 来源智库 | Science Policy Research Unit (United Kingdom) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/466975 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Stirling, Andrew. Inclusive deliberation and scientific expertise: precaution, diversity and transparency in the governance of risk.. 2001. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Stirling, Andrew]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Stirling, Andrew]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Stirling, Andrew]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
