| 来源类型 | Reports and working papers |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| Science in trade disputes related to potential risks: comparative case studies. ESTO Report. | |
| Millstone, Erik; Van Zwanenberg, Patrick; Marris, Claire; Levidow, Les; Torgersen, Helge | |
| 发表日期 | 2004-09 |
| 出版者 | IPTS |
| 出版年 | 2004 |
| 页码 | 1-54 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | The report presents the results of a study on the use of science in decision-making when facing uncertainty comparing three actual trade conflicts where the contrasting outcomes have been analysed: the WTO hormones-in-meat dispute, the genetically engineered recombinant Bovine Somatotropin (r-BST) dispute and the Austrian ban to Monsanto's GM maize expressing the Bt gene. The general conclusion, after interviewing major key players in the three cases, is that the differences in the judgements and policies in the EU and the USA have arisen not just because different answers have been given to a common set of questions, but also because different questions are being asked. The "different questions asked" reflect that the "risk universe" is defined differently by the trade partners |
| URL | http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/29511/ |
| 来源智库 | Science Policy Research Unit (United Kingdom) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/467127 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Millstone, Erik,Van Zwanenberg, Patrick,Marris, Claire,et al. Science in trade disputes related to potential risks: comparative case studies. ESTO Report.. 2004. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
