G2TT
来源类型Article
规范类型其他
DOI10.1007/s10806-007-9045-x
ISBN1187-7863
Can food safety policy-making be both scientifically and democratically legitimated? If so, how?
Millstone, Erik
发表日期2007-10-01
出处Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
出版者Kluwer
出版年2007
页码483-508
语种英语
摘要This paper provides an analysis of the evolution of thinking and talking about the role of scientific knowledge and expertise in food safety policy-making, and in risk policy-making more generally from the late 19th century to the present day. It highlights the defining characteristics of several models that have been used to represent and interpret the relations between policy-makers and expert scientific advisors and between scientific and political considerations. Both conceptual and empirical strengths and weaknesses of those models are identified, focusing in particular on the ways in which they deal with scientific uncertainties and social choices. By drawing on both empirical evidence and conceptual analysis, a novel and more realistic model is provided along with an account of some conditions for food safety policy-making achieving both scientific and democratic legitimacy
特色分类H Social Sciences (General)
URLhttp://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/17510/
来源智库Science Policy Research Unit (United Kingdom)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/467384
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Millstone, Erik. Can food safety policy-making be both scientifically and democratically legitimated? If so, how?. 2007.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Millstone, Erik]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Millstone, Erik]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Millstone, Erik]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。