| 来源类型 | Article
|
| 规范类型 | 其他
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10806-007-9045-x
|
| ISBN | 1187-7863
|
| Can food safety policy-making be both scientifically and democratically legitimated? If so, how? |
| Millstone, Erik
|
| 发表日期 | 2007-10-01
|
| 出处 | Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
|
| 出版者 | Kluwer
|
| 出版年 | 2007
|
| 页码 | 483-508
|
| 语种 | 英语
|
| 摘要 | This paper provides an analysis of the evolution of thinking and talking about the role of scientific knowledge and expertise in food safety policy-making, and in risk policy-making more generally from the late 19th century to the present day. It highlights the defining characteristics of several models that have been used to represent and interpret the relations between policy-makers and expert scientific advisors and between scientific and political considerations. Both conceptual and empirical strengths and weaknesses of those models are identified, focusing in particular on the ways in which they deal with scientific uncertainties and social choices. By drawing on both empirical evidence and conceptual analysis, a novel and more realistic model is provided along with an account of some conditions for food safety policy-making achieving both scientific and democratic legitimacy |
| 特色分类 | H Social Sciences (General)
|
| URL | http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/17510/
|
| 来源智库 | Science Policy Research Unit (United Kingdom)
|
| 引用统计 |
|
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/467384
|
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714 |
Millstone, Erik. Can food safety policy-making be both scientifically and democratically legitimated? If so, how?. 2007.
|
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
