| 来源类型 | Article |
| 规范类型 | 其他 |
| DOI | 10.3152/030234207X254396 |
| ISBN | 0302-3427 |
| Peer review and the relevance gap: ten suggestions for policy-makers. | |
| Nightingale, Paul; Scott, Alister | |
| 发表日期 | 2007-10 |
| 出处 | Science and Public Policy |
| 出版者 | Oxford University Press |
| 出版年 | 2007 |
| 页码 | 543-553 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | Long-term changes in knowledge production can produce mismatches between the research that society requires and the research that society produces — what we term `relevance gaps'. This paper explores what can be done to close them. The paper argues that current structures for governing research are often inappropriate, damage the reputation and value system of the academy, and produce a widespread perception that much research is irrelevant. New ways are needed to address how disciplinary value judgements and the structure of peer review influence the direction of academic research. Alternatives to current peer-review practices and guidelines for funding agencies are proposed |
| URL | http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/28681/ |
| 来源智库 | Science Policy Research Unit (United Kingdom) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/467385 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Nightingale, Paul,Scott, Alister. Peer review and the relevance gap: ten suggestions for policy-makers.. 2007. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
