| 来源类型 | Book Section
|
| 规范类型 | 其他
|
| ISBN | 0809-8735
|
| ISSN | 9788299636766
|
| Research misconduct - does self-policing work? |
| Martin, Ben R.
|
| 发表日期 | 2008
|
| 出处 | Confluence: Interdisciplinary Communications
|
| 出版者 | Centre for Advanced Study
|
| 出版年 | 2008
|
| 页码 | 59-69
|
| 语种 | 英语
|
| 摘要 | The world of academic research has been described as The Republic of Science. This has various characteristics, one being that it operates on the basis of self-policing. This self-policing is believed to be effective in ensuring that academic misconduct is rare, generally low-level and selfcorrecting. Any serious misconduct, it is assumed, will be quickly detected by peer review and stopped. The risks of being caught and the severity of the sanctions that follow are presumed to be so great that few will be tempted to stray down this route. While plagiarism is increasing among students, such misconduct has not generally been seen as a major problem among academics. However, the case described here should force us to reconsider our preconceptions about the efficacy of self-policing. |
| URL | http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/28231/
|
| 来源智库 | Science Policy Research Unit (United Kingdom)
|
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/467405
|
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714 |
Martin, Ben R.. Research misconduct - does self-policing work?. 2008.
|
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
