| 来源类型 | Article |
| 规范类型 | 其他 |
| DOI | 10.3152/095820211X13118583635693 |
| ISBN | 0958-2029 |
| The research excellence framework and the impact agenda: are we creating a Frankenstein monster? | |
| Martin, Ben | |
| 发表日期 | 2011-09-01 |
| 出处 | Research Evaluation |
| 出版者 | Beech Tree Publishing |
| 出版年 | 2011 |
| 页码 | 247-254 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | In pursuit of public accountability, the mechanisms for assessing research performance have become more complicated and burdensome. In the United Kingdom, the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) evolved from an initially simple framework to something much more complex and onerous. As the RAE now gives way to the Research Excellence Framework (REF), 'impact assessment' is being added to the process. Impact comes in numerous forms, however, so its assessment is far from straightforward. While HEFCE is initially proposing a relatively simple methodology, the history of the RAE suggests that this approach will over time become ever more sophisticated. Yet if the 'costs' of an elaborate system for assessing 'research excellence' and its impact then exceed the benefits, the time may have come to re-examine whether a dual-support system still represents the optimum way of funding university research. |
| URL | http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/24790/ |
| 来源智库 | Science Policy Research Unit (United Kingdom) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/467903 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Martin, Ben. The research excellence framework and the impact agenda: are we creating a Frankenstein monster?. 2011. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Martin, Ben]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Martin, Ben]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Martin, Ben]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
