| 来源类型 | Book Section
|
| 规范类型 | 其他
|
| ISSN | 9789814340977
|
| Does peer review work as a self-policing mechanism in preventing misconduct: a case study of a serial plagiarist. |
| Martin, Ben R
|
| 发表日期 | 2012-01-25
|
| 出版者 | World Scientific Publishing
|
| 出版年 | 2012
|
| 页码 | 97-114
|
| 语种 | 英语
|
| 摘要 | Many fondly assume that The Republic of Science operates successfully on the basis of self-policing. One of the implicit assumptions here is that research misconduct is rare, generally low-level and self-correcting. A second is that any serious misconduct is quickly detected by peer review and stopped. A third is that the risk of being caught and the severe repercussions that follow are such that few researchers are tempted to stray. However, all this presupposes that peer review does indeed succeed in detecting misconduct, and that editors, publishers, universities and the wider research community then work effectively together to investigate problem cases and implement any necessary sanctions. In this chapter, I describe a case-study demonstrating what happens when those involved do not work closely together, a case-study that may force us to reconsider our cherished preconceptions about the efficacy of self-policing. |
| 特色分类 | H Social Sciences (General)
|
| URL | http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/18580/
|
| 来源智库 | Science Policy Research Unit (United Kingdom)
|
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/467964
|
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714 |
Martin, Ben R. Does peer review work as a self-policing mechanism in preventing misconduct: a case study of a serial plagiarist.. 2012.
|
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
