| 来源类型 | Article |
| 规范类型 | 其他 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.039 |
| ISBN | 0360-5442 |
| Competing policy packages and the complexity of energy security. | |
| Sovacool, Benjamin K; Saunders, Harry | |
| 发表日期 | 2014-04-01 |
| 出处 | Energy |
| 出版者 | Elsevier |
| 出版年 | 2014 |
| 页码 | 641-651 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | To underscore both the diversity and severity of energy security tradeoffs, this study examines five different energy security policy packages—five distinct strategies aimed at reducing oil dependence, enhancing energy affordability, expanding access to modern energy services, responding to climate change, and minimizing the water intensity of energy production. It identifies both compelling synergies and conflicts between each of the five strategies. The central value of the study is that it turns on its head the widely accepted notion of a “portfolio approach” or “all of the above” strategy to energy policymaking. To make this case, the article begins by elucidating the complexity and multidimensionality of energy security as a concept. It then introduces our five energy security policy packages to illustrate how some energy security objectives complement each other whereas others counteract each other. It concludes by noting that energy security is not an absolute state, and that achieving it only “works” by prioritizing some dimensions, or policy goals and packages, more than others. |
| URL | http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/58375/ |
| 来源智库 | Science Policy Research Unit (United Kingdom) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/468314 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Sovacool, Benjamin K,Saunders, Harry. Competing policy packages and the complexity of energy security.. 2014. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
