G2TT
来源类型Article
规范类型其他
DOI10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.030
ISBN0040-1625
Reconciling qualitative storylines and quantitative descriptions: an iterative approach.
Robertson, Elizabeth; O'Grady, Áine; Barton, John; Galloway, Stuart; Emmanuel-Yusuf, Damiete; Leach, Matthew; Hammond, Geoff; Thomson, Murray; Foxon, Tim
发表日期2017-03-15
出处Technological Forecasting and Social Change
出版者Elsevier
出版年2017
页码293-306
语种英语
摘要Energy system transition research has been experimenting with the integration of qualitative and quantitative analysis due to the increased articulation it provides. Current approaches tend to be heavily biased by qualitative or quantitative methodologies, and more often are aimed toward a single academic discipline. This paper proposes an interdisciplinary methodology for the elaboration of energy system socio-technical scenarios, applied here to the low carbon transition of the UK. An iterative approach was used to produce quantitative descriptions of the UK's energy transition out to 2050, building on qualitative storylines or narratives that had been developed through the formal application of a transition pathways approach. The combination of the qualitative and quantitative analysis in this way subsequently formed the cornerstone of wider interdisciplinary research, helping to harmonise assumptions, and facilitating ‘whole systems’ thinking. The methodology pulls on niche expertise of contributors to map and investigate the governance and technological landscape of a system change. Initial inconsistencies were found between energy supply and demand and addressed, the treatment of gas generation, capacity factors, total installed generating capacity and installation rates of renewables employed. Knowledge gaps relating to the operation of combined heat and power, sources of waste heat and future fuel sources were also investigated. Adopting the methodological approach to integrate qualitative and quantitative analysis resulted in a far more comprehensive elaboration than previously, providing a stronger basis for wider research, and for deducing more robust insights for decision-making. It is asserted that this formal process helps build robust future scenarios not only for socio political storylines but also for the quantification of any qualitative storyline.
特色分类H Social Sciences (General)$TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
关键词Scenarios Storylines Energy Climate change Interdisciplinary Quantification
URLhttp://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/69885/
来源智库Science Policy Research Unit (United Kingdom)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/468872
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Robertson, Elizabeth,O'Grady, Áine,Barton, John,et al. Reconciling qualitative storylines and quantitative descriptions: an iterative approach.. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
__smbhome.uscs.susx.(2309KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Robertson, Elizabeth]的文章
[O'Grady, Áine]的文章
[Barton, John]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Robertson, Elizabeth]的文章
[O'Grady, Áine]的文章
[Barton, John]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Robertson, Elizabeth]的文章
[O'Grady, Áine]的文章
[Barton, John]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: __smbhome.uscs.susx.ac.uk_tjf25_Documents_My papers_Tech_Fore_Soc_Ch_Robertson_Foxon_2017.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。