G2TT
来源类型Article
规范类型其他
DOI10.1111/risa.12587
ISBN0272-4332
Of disasters and dragon kings: a statistical analysis of nuclear power incidents and accidents.
Wheatley, Spencer; Sovacool, Benjamin; Sornette, Didier
发表日期2017-03-22
出处Risk Analysis
出版者Wiley
出版年2017
页码99-115
语种英语
摘要We perform a statistical study of risk in nuclear energy systems. This study provides and analyzes a data set that is twice the size of the previous best data set on nuclear incidents and accidents, comparing three measures of severity: the industry standard International Nuclear Event Scale, the Nuclear Accident Magnitude Scale of radiation release, and cost in U.S. dollars. The rate of nuclear accidents with cost above 20 MM 2013 USD, per reactor per year, has decreased from the 1970s until the present time. Along the way, the rate dropped significantly after Chernobyl (April 1986) and is expected to be roughly stable around a level of 0.003, suggesting an average of just over one event per year across the current global fleet. The distribution of costs appears to have changed following the Three Mile Island major accident (March 1979). The median cost became approximately 3.5 times smaller, but an extremely heavy tail emerged, being well described by a Pareto distribution with parameter α = 0.5–0.6. For instance, the cost of the two largest events, Chernobyl and Fukushima (March 2011), is equal to nearly five times the sum of the 173 other events. We also document a significant runaway disaster regime in both radiation release and cost data, which we associate with the “dragon-king” phenomenon. Since the major accident at Fukushima (March 2011) occurred recently, we are unable to quantify an impact of the industry response to this disaster. Excluding such improvements, in terms of costs, our range of models suggests that there is presently a 50% chance that (i) a Fukushima event (or larger) occurs every 60–150 years, and (ii) that a Three Mile Island event (or larger) occurs every 10–20 years. Further—even assuming that it is no longer possible to suffer an event more costly than Chernobyl or Fukushima—the expected annual cost and its standard error bracket the cost of a new plant. This highlights the importance of improvements not only immediately following Fukushima, but also deeper improvements to effectively exclude the possibility of “dragon-king” disasters. Finally, we find that the International Nuclear Event Scale (INES) is inconsistent in terms of both cost and radiation released. To be consistent with cost data, the Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters would need to have between an INES level of 10 and 11, rather than the maximum of 7.
URLhttp://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/66356/
来源智库Science Policy Research Unit (United Kingdom)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/468875
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Wheatley, Spencer,Sovacool, Benjamin,Sornette, Didier. Of disasters and dragon kings: a statistical analysis of nuclear power incidents and accidents.. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
Wheatley_et_al-2016-(756KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Wheatley, Spencer]的文章
[Sovacool, Benjamin]的文章
[Sornette, Didier]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Wheatley, Spencer]的文章
[Sovacool, Benjamin]的文章
[Sornette, Didier]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Wheatley, Spencer]的文章
[Sovacool, Benjamin]的文章
[Sornette, Didier]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: Wheatley_et_al-2016-Risk_Analysis.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。