G2TT
来源类型Article
规范类型其他
DOI10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.033
ISBN0301-4215
Navigating the 'paradox of openness' in energy and transport innovation: insights from eight corporate clean technology research and development case studies.
Sovacool, Benjamin K; Jeppesen, Jakob; Bandsholm, Jesper; Asmussen, Joakim; Balachandran, Rakulan; Vestergaard, Simon; Hauerslev Andersen, Thomas; Klode Sørensen, Thomas; Bjørn-Thygesen, Frans
发表日期2017-06-01
出处Energy Policy
出版者Elsevier
出版年2017
页码236-245
语种英语
摘要Using an inductive case study approach drawn from original interview data, this article investigates the innovation approaches among a sample of international energy companies, or corporate firms. It first presents a conceptual framework synthesized from the business studies, entrepreneurship, evolutionary economics, innovation studies, management science, organization studies, political science, and sociology literature. This framework suggests that corporate approaches to clean technology innovation will cut across the four dimensions of organizational multiplicity and stakeholder involvement, information sharing, coordination and control, and market orientation. It then explores how eight firms—the Algal Carbon Conversion Flagship and Aurora Algae (biofuel), DONG and Statoil (carbon capture and storage), Tesla and Volkswagen (electric vehicles), and Siemens and Vestas (offshore wind turbines)—approach clean technology development with “open innovation” attributes mixed with “closed” attributes. Although the study finds striking similarities among the particular approaches embraced by each corporate actor, it also notes that approaches are technology and firm specific, and the potential for different permutations leads to an almost endless number of possible stylistic combinations. The innovation profiles depicted also reveal conflict and competition among various stakeholders, the implication being that corporate innovation in the energy sector remains a conflicted, disjointed, and messy process.
URLhttp://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/66977/
来源智库Science Policy Research Unit (United Kingdom)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/468901
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Sovacool, Benjamin K,Jeppesen, Jakob,Bandsholm, Jesper,et al. Navigating the 'paradox of openness' in energy and transport innovation: insights from eight corporate clean technology research and development case studies.. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
Open-Innovation-1109(488KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Sovacool, Benjamin K]的文章
[Jeppesen, Jakob]的文章
[Bandsholm, Jesper]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Sovacool, Benjamin K]的文章
[Jeppesen, Jakob]的文章
[Bandsholm, Jesper]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Sovacool, Benjamin K]的文章
[Jeppesen, Jakob]的文章
[Bandsholm, Jesper]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: Open-Innovation-110916.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。