Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Article |
规范类型 | 其他 |
DOI | 10.1525/cse.2017.000463 |
ISBN | 2473-9510 |
Cooperative or inoperative? Accountability and transparency at the World Bank’s inspection panel. | |
Sovacool, Benjamin | |
发表日期 | 2017-12-01 |
出处 | Case Studies in the Environment |
出版者 | University of California Press |
出版年 | 2017 |
页码 | 1-9 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | The World Bank remains the largest international financial institution in the world. This case study examines the effectiveness of the World Bank’s Inspection Panel. The Inspection Panel makes it possible for citizens and communities to challenge World Bank projects through an independently administered accountability process. Between 1994 and 2016, the World Bank Inspection Panel has received 112 requests for inspection across more than 50 countries. This case study analyzes the history, dynamics, benefits, and barriers to the Inspection Panel, including an assessment of World Bank projects spread across Albania, Argentina, Bangladesh, Benin, Brazil, Cameroon, Chad, China, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ghana, India, Kenya, Lesotho, Nepal, Nigeria, Romania, Tibet, Togo, and Uzbekistan. In doing so, the case study highlights how Inspection Panels like the one operating at the World Bank can improve and enhance governance outcomes and result in more equitable decision-making processes. Yet there are also limits to what such independent accountability mechanisms can accomplish. |
URL | http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/70342/ |
来源智库 | Science Policy Research Unit (United Kingdom) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/468983 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Sovacool, Benjamin. Cooperative or inoperative? Accountability and transparency at the World Bank’s inspection panel.. 2017. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Sovacool, Benjamin]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Sovacool, Benjamin]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Sovacool, Benjamin]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。