Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Article |
规范类型 | 其他 |
DOI | 10.1057/s41311-017-0085-1 |
ISBN | 1384-5748 |
‘Muddling through’ in the Biological & Toxin Weapons Convention. | |
Revill, James | |
发表日期 | 2018-05-01 |
出处 | International Politics |
出版者 | Palgrave Macmillan |
出版年 | 2018 |
页码 | 386-401 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | The paper looks at power in the origins and evolution of the Biological & Toxin Weapons Convention (BWC). It begins by looking at the origins of what some have termed a taboo surrounding poison weapons, before turning to look at the role of different forms of power in the genesis of the BWC in the late 1960s. The article proceeds to look at the role of institutional power in the evolution of the convention before turning to the limitations generated by the diffused nature of power. The chapter concludes by exploring the literature on public administration, particularly Lindblom’s notion of ‘incrementalism’ to outline how the BWC is essentially ‘muddling through’ and to some extent is largely limited to muddling through because of the consensus rule and the limits of productive power within the BWC. |
特色分类 | JZ5587 International security. Disarmament. Global survival |
URL | http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/61812/ |
来源智库 | Science Policy Research Unit (United Kingdom) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/469052 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Revill, James. ‘Muddling through’ in the Biological & Toxin Weapons Convention.. 2018. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
Muddling through in (664KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Revill, James]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Revill, James]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Revill, James]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。