Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Research Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
Medicaid Reform Debate in 1997, The | |
John Holahan; Joshua M. Wiener; David Liska | |
发表日期 | 1997-07-01 |
出版年 | 1997 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | The five-year plan to balance the federal budget requires Medicaid savings of approximately $16 billion. The compromise between President Clinton and Congress generated savings from increased state flexibility and limitations on disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payments rather than imposing caps on the increase in average federal Medicaid expenditures per enrollee. This paper analyzes several issues: |
摘要 | The five-year plan to balance the federal budget requires Medicaid savings of approximately $16 billion. The compromise between President Clinton and Congress generated savings from increased state flexibility and limitations on disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payments rather than imposing caps on the increase in average federal Medicaid expenditures per enrollee. This paper analyzes several issues: imposition of limits on the growth in average expenditures; reduction in DSH payments; expansion of state flexibility in managing the Medicaid program; and use of some of the savings to encourage states to expand health insurance coverage for children.
|
主题 | Health and Health Policy |
URL | https://www.urban.org/research/publication/medicaid-reform-debate-1997 |
来源智库 | Urban Institute (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/473408 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | John Holahan,Joshua M. Wiener,David Liska. Medicaid Reform Debate in 1997, The. 1997. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
307049-Medicaid-Refo(486KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。