G2TT
来源类型Research Report
规范类型报告
Is There a Hole in the Bucket? Understanding SCHIP Retention
Ian Hill; Amy Westpfahl Lutzky
发表日期2003-05-16
出版年2003
语种英语
概述This analysis of the SCHIP and Medicaid eligibility redetermination processes in 8 states finds that redetermination processes have not been simplified to the same extent as initial enrollment processes. Less than 50 percent of children appeared to retain SCHIP eligibility at redetermination. Between 10 and 40 percent of children were "lost" at redetermination because their parents never responded to renewal
摘要
This analysis of the SCHIP and Medicaid eligibility redetermination processes in 8 states finds that redetermination processes have not been simplified to the same extent as initial enrollment processes. Less than 50 percent of children appeared to retain SCHIP eligibility at redetermination. Between 10 and 40 percent of children were "lost" at redetermination because their parents never responded to renewal notices or submitted renewal applications. Failure to pay premiums may reflect several possible outcomes besides affordability. State data systems are unable to report precisely on the outcomes of the eligibility redetermination process.
主题Children ; Health and Health Policy
URLhttps://www.urban.org/research/publication/there-hole-bucket-understanding-schip-retention
来源智库Urban Institute (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/474763
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Ian Hill,Amy Westpfahl Lutzky. Is There a Hole in the Bucket? Understanding SCHIP Retention. 2003.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
310792-Is-There-a-Ho(535KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Ian Hill]的文章
[Amy Westpfahl Lutzky]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Ian Hill]的文章
[Amy Westpfahl Lutzky]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Ian Hill]的文章
[Amy Westpfahl Lutzky]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: 310792-Is-There-a-Hole-in-the-Bucket-Understanding-SCHIP-Retention.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。