Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Research Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
Getting In, Not Getting In, and Why | |
其他题名 | Understanding SCHIP Enrollment |
Ian Hill; Amy Westpfahl Lutzky | |
发表日期 | 2003-05-16 |
出版年 | 2003 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | This analysis of the SCHIP and Medicaid application processes in 8 states finds that states have implemented similar strategies for simplifying SCHIP enrollment, but simplifications to Medicaid are less extensive. Inconsistencies between SCHIP and Medicaid eligibility requirements and procedures can make the enrollment process confusing for families. While less than 50 percent of applications were approved for |
摘要 | This analysis of the SCHIP and Medicaid application processes in 8 states finds that states have implemented similar strategies for simplifying SCHIP enrollment, but simplifications to Medicaid are less extensive. Inconsistencies between SCHIP and Medicaid eligibility requirements and procedures can make the enrollment process confusing for families. While less than 50 percent of applications were approved for SCHIP in many states, a large proportion appeared eligible for Medicaid and were referred to that program. Large proportions of SCHIP applications are denied for procedural reasons. SCHIP programs ask families about existing health insurance coverage, but only a small proportion already have insurance. State data systems cannot precisely report on the outcomes of the eligibility process.
|
主题 | Children ; Health and Health Policy |
URL | https://www.urban.org/research/publication/getting-not-getting-and-why |
来源智库 | Urban Institute (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/474764 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Ian Hill,Amy Westpfahl Lutzky. Getting In, Not Getting In, and Why. 2003. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
310793-Getting-In-No(544KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Ian Hill]的文章 |
[Amy Westpfahl Lutzky]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Ian Hill]的文章 |
[Amy Westpfahl Lutzky]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Ian Hill]的文章 |
[Amy Westpfahl Lutzky]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。