G2TT
来源类型Assessment Paper
规范类型论文
Copenhagen Consensus: Conflicts Assessment, Collier Hoeffler
Anke Hoeffler; Paul Collier
语种英语
概述By Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler. Although wars between nations have become less common in recent decades, the frequency of civil wars around the world has increased. These two types of conflict cannot sensibly be analysed together. This paper focuses entirely on reducing the incidence of civil wars.
摘要

Copenhagen Consensus: Conflicts Assessment, Collier Hoeffler

An Assessment Paper on Conflict was prepared for the 2004 Copenhagen Consensus by Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler. The working paper used by the Expert Panel is available for download here, the finalized paper has been published in Global Crises, Global Solutions by Cambridge University Press.

Short Summary

Although wars between nations have become less common in recent decades, the frequency of civil wars around the world has increased. These two types of conflict cannot sensibly be analysed together. This paper focuses entirely on reducing the incidence of civil wars. Since the post-conflict period actually presents particularly high risks, the biggest opportunity lies in preventing wars from recurring.

Within the challenge of reducing the global incidence of civil war, this paper focuses on three opportunities. These are the prevention of civil war in currently peaceful environments; the shortening of conflicts in currently war-torn environments; and the reduction in the risk of the resumption of conflict in postconflict situations. These opportunities are very different, both in terms of instruments and pay-offs. Probably the highest pay-off is from improved interventions in post-conflict situations. Post-conflict relapses into renewed violence account for around half of all global civil wars, and so they provide an opportunity for highly focused interventions. By contrast, prevention is a highly diffuse approach.

主题Conflicts and Terrorism
URLhttps://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/publication/copenhagen-consensus-conflicts-assessment-collier-hoeffler
来源智库Copenhagen Consensus Center (Denmark)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/47479
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Anke Hoeffler,Paul Collier. Copenhagen Consensus: Conflicts Assessment, Collier Hoeffler.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
cp-conflictsfinished(481KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Anke Hoeffler]的文章
[Paul Collier]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Anke Hoeffler]的文章
[Paul Collier]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Anke Hoeffler]的文章
[Paul Collier]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: cp-conflictsfinished.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。