Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Assessment Paper |
规范类型 | 论文 |
Copenhagen Consensus: Conflicts Assessment, Collier Hoeffler | |
Anke Hoeffler; Paul Collier | |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | By Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler. Although wars between nations have become less common in recent decades, the frequency of civil wars around the world has increased. These two types of conflict cannot sensibly be analysed together. This paper focuses entirely on reducing the incidence of civil wars. |
摘要 | Copenhagen Consensus: Conflicts Assessment, Collier HoefflerAn Assessment Paper on Conflict was prepared for the 2004 Copenhagen Consensus by Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler. The working paper used by the Expert Panel is available for download here, the finalized paper has been published in Global Crises, Global Solutions by Cambridge University Press. Short SummaryAlthough wars between nations have become less common in recent decades, the frequency of civil wars around the world has increased. These two types of conflict cannot sensibly be analysed together. This paper focuses entirely on reducing the incidence of civil wars. Since the post-conflict period actually presents particularly high risks, the biggest opportunity lies in preventing wars from recurring. Within the challenge of reducing the global incidence of civil war, this paper focuses on three opportunities. These are the prevention of civil war in currently peaceful environments; the shortening of conflicts in currently war-torn environments; and the reduction in the risk of the resumption of conflict in postconflict situations. These opportunities are very different, both in terms of instruments and pay-offs. Probably the highest pay-off is from improved interventions in post-conflict situations. Post-conflict relapses into renewed violence account for around half of all global civil wars, and so they provide an opportunity for highly focused interventions. By contrast, prevention is a highly diffuse approach. |
主题 | Conflicts and Terrorism |
URL | https://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/publication/copenhagen-consensus-conflicts-assessment-collier-hoeffler |
来源智库 | Copenhagen Consensus Center (Denmark) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/47479 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Anke Hoeffler,Paul Collier. Copenhagen Consensus: Conflicts Assessment, Collier Hoeffler. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
cp-conflictsfinished(481KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Anke Hoeffler]的文章 |
[Paul Collier]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Anke Hoeffler]的文章 |
[Paul Collier]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Anke Hoeffler]的文章 |
[Paul Collier]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。