Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Brief |
规范类型 | 简报 |
Squeezing SCHIP | |
其他题名 | States Use Flexibility to Respond to the Ongoing Budget Crisis |
Ian Hill; Holly Stockdale; Brigette Courtot | |
发表日期 | 2004-06-02 |
出版年 | 2004 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | Interviews with SCHIP administrators in 13 states indicate that cuts to SCHIP in FY 2003 were more widespread than in 2002. Virtually all states reduced or eliminated outreach activities. Four states either froze enrollment or reduced eligibility thresholds. Half the states raised premiums and copayments for program participants. Five states either froze or cut provider reimbursement. Compared with other areas |
摘要 | Interviews with SCHIP administrators in 13 states indicate that cuts to SCHIP in FY 2003 were more widespread than in 2002. Virtually all states reduced or eliminated outreach activities. Four states either froze enrollment or reduced eligibility thresholds. Half the states raised premiums and copayments for program participants. Five states either froze or cut provider reimbursement. Compared with other areas in state budgets, state officials universally described SCHIP cuts as among the smallest, and last, to be adopted, reflecting policymakers' strong support of the program. In addition, most states continued to simplify enrollment, and generous benefits were maintained in all but two states. Despite the deeper cuts, states' capacity to insure children remains much stronger than before the creation of SCHIP in 1997.
|
主题 | Children ; Health and Health Policy ; Taxes and Budget |
URL | https://www.urban.org/research/publication/squeezing-schip |
来源智库 | Urban Institute (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/475108 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Ian Hill,Holly Stockdale,Brigette Courtot. Squeezing SCHIP. 2004. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
311015-Squeezing-SCH(166KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。