Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Best Practice Paper |
规范类型 | 论文 |
Second Copenhagen Consensus: Deworming Best Practice, Hall Horton | |
Susan Horton | |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | By Andrew Hall & Sue Horton In the Copenhagen Consensus 2008 the Expert panel ranked five nutritional interventions among the top ten of 30 proposals to answer the question, what would be the... |
摘要 | Second Copenhagen Consensus: Deworming Best Practice, Hall HortonBy Andrew Hall & Sue Horton In the Copenhagen Consensus 2008 the Expert panel ranked five nutritional interventions among the top ten of 30 proposals to answer the question, what would be the best ways of advancing global welfare? Deworming and other nutrition programmes in school were ranked as the sixth best intervention overall, considering their potential benefit:cost ratio, anticipated feasibility and the sustainability of the intervention. |
主题 | Hunger and Malnutrition ; Education |
URL | https://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/publication/second-copenhagen-consensus-deworming-best-practice-hall-horton |
来源智库 | Copenhagen Consensus Center (Denmark) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/47544 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Susan Horton. Second Copenhagen Consensus: Deworming Best Practice, Hall Horton. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
deworming.pdf(1714KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Susan Horton]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Susan Horton]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Susan Horton]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。