G2TT
来源类型Policy Advice
规范类型论文
Preliminary Benefit-Cost Assessment for 12th Session OWG Goals
Aart Kraay; Adele Morris; Alex Cobham; Amy Sopinka; Anil Deolalikar; Anil Markandya; Anke Hoeffler; Bjorn Larsen; Carolyn Fischer; Edward Glaeser; George Psacharopoulos; Guy Hutton; Hans-Peter Kohler; Ibrahim Kasirye; Irma Clots Figueras; Isabel Galiana; James Fearon; John C. Whitehead; John Gibson; Kamal Saggi; Keith Maskus; Kym Anderson; Laurence Chandy; Mark Rosegrant; Mary Hilderbrand; Michael Hanneman; Morten Jerven; Pamela Smith; Prabhat Jha
语种英语
概述The Copenhagen Consensus has updated our benefit-cost assessment of UN Post-2015 Millennium Development Goals for the 12th session of the Open Working Group. The Copenhagen Consensus will present...
摘要

Preliminary Benefit-Cost Assessment for 12th Session OWG Goals

The Copenhagen Consensus has updated our benefit-cost assessment of UN Post-2015 Millennium Development Goals for the 12th session of the Open Working Group.  The Copenhagen Consensus will present full, peer-reviewed economic evidence over the coming half year.

This  report  builds  upon  the  similar  analysis  Copenhagen  Consensus  Center conducted  on  the 11th  OWG document. Extensions of analysis beyond the 11th  session report include: 
•    Ratings for most new targets
•    Ratings for Focus Area 9: Promote sustainable industrialization 
•    Ratings for Focus Area 10: Reduce inequality within and among nations
•    Ratings for Focus Area 14: Attain conservation and sustainable use of marine resources, oceans and seas
•    As requested, the report also contains more explanation on many targets rated poor and suggestions for better wording of many targets.

The Copenhagen Consensus Center provides information on which targets will do the most social good relative to their costs. Some of the world’s top economists have assessed the targets from the 12th  session Open Working Group document into one of five categories, based on economic evidence: 

PHENOMENAL – Robust evidence for benefits more than 15 times higher than costs
GOOD – Robust evidence of benefits between 5 to 15 times higher than costs
FAIR – Robust evidence of benefits between 1 to 5 times higher than costs
POOR – The benefits are smaller than costs or target poorly specified (e.g. internally inconsistent, incentivizes wrong activity)
UNCERTAIN – There is not enough knowledge of the policy options that could reach the target OR the costs and benefits of the actions to reach the target are not well known

More than twenty of the world's top economists have made a preliminary assessment of the 212 targets in the 12th OWG session paper. They have done so in terms of which targets will do the most social good relative to their cost. While it is measured in dollars, this is not just about money - it also incorporates the costs and benefits of for instance health, welfare and environmental protection. 

主题Climate Change & Energy ; Hunger and Malnutrition ; Health ; Conflicts and Terrorism ; Trade and Migration ; Education ; Inequality ; Water & Sanitation ; Environment ; Governance ; Natural Disasters ; Population Growth ; Infrastructure ; Finance and Economy ; Technology & Data
URLhttps://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/publication/preliminary-benefit-cost-assessment-12th-session-owg-goals
来源智库Copenhagen Consensus Center (Denmark)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/47682
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Aart Kraay,Adele Morris,Alex Cobham,et al. Preliminary Benefit-Cost Assessment for 12th Session OWG Goals.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
owg12.cost-benefit-a(650KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Aart Kraay]的文章
[Adele Morris]的文章
[Alex Cobham]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Aart Kraay]的文章
[Adele Morris]的文章
[Alex Cobham]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Aart Kraay]的文章
[Adele Morris]的文章
[Alex Cobham]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: owg12.cost-benefit-assessment_0.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。