Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Brief |
规范类型 | 简报 |
Improving U.S. Housing Finance through Reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac | |
其他题名 | Assessing the Options |
Ingrid Gould Ellen; John Napier Tye; Mark A. Willis | |
发表日期 | 2010-05-18 |
出版年 | 2010 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | For several decades, the Government-Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs), Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, were the largest players in an American housing finance system that provided effective mortgage financing for many millions of Americans. Since early 2008, the firms' near-insolvency has called their future into question. This paper lays out criteria for evaluating the different proposals for reform of the two firms. We |
摘要 | For several decades, the Government-Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs), Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, were the largest players in an American housing finance system that provided effective mortgage financing for many millions of Americans. Since early 2008, the firms' near-insolvency has called their future into question. This paper lays out criteria for evaluating the different proposals for reform of the two firms. We make no recommendations among the proposals, but we do attempt to assess the major advantages and disadvantages of their respective approaches.
|
主题 | Economic Growth and Productivity ; Housing and Housing Finance ; Neighborhoods, Cities, and Metros |
URL | https://www.urban.org/research/publication/improving-us-housing-finance-through-reform-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac |
来源智库 | Urban Institute (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/476933 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Ingrid Gould Ellen,John Napier Tye,Mark A. Willis. Improving U.S. Housing Finance through Reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. 2010. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
1001382-Improving-U-(310KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。