Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Brief |
规范类型 | 简报 |
Teacher Layoffs: An Empirical Illustration of Seniority vs. Measures of Effectiveness | |
Donald J. Boyd; Hamilton Lankford; Susanna Loeb; James Wyckoff | |
发表日期 | 2010-07-28 |
出版年 | 2010 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | In the face of unavoidable teacher layoffs, policymakers must juggle a variety of issues in choosing the best criteria for laying off teachers. The standard approach in most school districts relies on measures of seniority. Analyzing data on 4th and 5th grade teachers in New York City public schools, CALDER researchers find substantial differences in which teachers get cut under a seniority-based layoff policy |
摘要 | In the face of unavoidable teacher layoffs, policymakers must juggle a variety of issues in choosing the best criteria for laying off teachers. The standard approach in most school districts relies on measures of seniority. Analyzing data on 4th and 5th grade teachers in New York City public schools, CALDER researchers find substantial differences in which teachers get cut under a seniority-based layoff policy versus a policy based on teacher effectiveness (value-added). The authors model the two layoff scenarios to respond to a (fictional) budget shortfall equivalent. The bottom line is that teacher layoffs based on teacher performance, preferably multiple performance measures, lead to a more effective workforce and improved student performance.
|
主题 | Education and Training |
URL | https://www.urban.org/research/publication/teacher-layoffs-empirical-illustration-seniority-vs-measures-effectiveness |
来源智库 | Urban Institute (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/477053 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Donald J. Boyd,Hamilton Lankford,Susanna Loeb,et al. Teacher Layoffs: An Empirical Illustration of Seniority vs. Measures of Effectiveness. 2010. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
1001421-teacher-layo(335KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。