Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Brief |
规范类型 | 简报 |
Payment Reform: Bundled Episodes vs. Global Payments | |
Robert A. Berenson; Francois de Brantes; Rachel A. Burton | |
发表日期 | 2012-09-18 |
出版年 | 2012 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | There is widespread agreement that the current fee-for-service approach to paying for health care is problematic, but there is a lack of consensus on what should replace it. Medicare is pursuing bundled episode payments, and proponents like Francois de Brantes of the Health Care Incentives Improvement Institute have been laying the groundwork for implementation. But other experts, such as the Urban Institute's |
摘要 | There is widespread agreement that the current fee-for-service approach to paying for health care is problematic, but there is a lack of consensus on what should replace it. Medicare is pursuing bundled episode payments, and proponents like Francois de Brantes of the Health Care Incentives Improvement Institute have been laying the groundwork for implementation. But other experts, such as the Urban Institute's Robert Berenson, worry that the current interest in bundled payments will distract policy-makers from moving more decisively away from fee-for-service. In this Robert Wood Johnson Foundation-funded paper, de Brantes and Berenson debate the benefits and drawbacks of bundled payments and global capitation.
|
主题 | Health and Health Policy |
URL | https://www.urban.org/research/publication/payment-reform-bundled-episodes-vs-global-payments |
来源智库 | Urban Institute (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/477854 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Robert A. Berenson,Francois de Brantes,Rachel A. Burton. Payment Reform: Bundled Episodes vs. Global Payments. 2012. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
412655-Payment-Refor(171KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。