Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Research Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
Analyzing Different Enrollment Outcomes in Select States that Used the Federally Facilitated Marketplace in 2014 | |
Jane B. Wishner; Anna C. Spencer; Erik Wengle | |
发表日期 | 2014-11-13 |
出版年 | 2014 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | This paper analyzes two pairs of states—North Carolina and South Carolina, and Wisconsin and Ohio—that achieved very different enrollment rates in the federally facilitated Marketplace (FFM) during the 2014 open enrollment period; North Carolina and Wisconsin exceeded enrollment projections, while South Carolina and Ohio fell short of FFM averages. Demographics, uninsurance rates and FFM premium rates did not |
摘要 | This paper analyzes two pairs of states—North Carolina and South Carolina, and Wisconsin and Ohio—that achieved very different enrollment rates in the federally facilitated Marketplace (FFM) during the 2014 open enrollment period; North Carolina and Wisconsin exceeded enrollment projections, while South Carolina and Ohio fell short of FFM averages. Demographics, uninsurance rates and FFM premium rates did not appear to explain the significant enrollment differences. Intense anti-Affordable Care Act environments in the two states that did less well, however, and a coordinated coalition of diverse stakeholders in the states that performed better did appear to improve FFM enrollment outcomes.
|
主题 | Health and Health Policy |
URL | https://www.urban.org/research/publication/analyzing-different-enrollment-outcomes-select-states-used-federally-facilitated-marketplace-2014 |
来源智库 | Urban Institute (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/478691 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Jane B. Wishner,Anna C. Spencer,Erik Wengle. Analyzing Different Enrollment Outcomes in Select States that Used the Federally Facilitated Marketplace in 2014. 2014. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
2000014-Analyzing-Di(284KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。